comment on article revelations and Ethics Wikileaks and the systemic question of 12/11/2010, by Hans Leyendecker.
The question "What message are reports prove to whom?" should not be made by the SZ, but are determined according to the present by Wikileaks information!
should go the "traditional" media about finding a position between between "embedded journalism" and Wikileaks, which is more than just feuilletonistic reasoning about generational conflicts.
In this context, the introduction of the article "Wikileaks and the system question "a little irritating. The speculation that the second Iraq war would be broken if the" informational Vandals "by Wikileaks would have struck even then leads, in view of the fact that the UN Security Council has been lied to justify the United States, in the void . The "truth", with or without Wikileaks, Collin Powell, with a cheap Photoshop fiction of mobile weapons of mass destruction delivered it himself.
is important is the fact that at that time the voices of millions of citizens who were protesting in the streets all over the world, however, , were simply ignored. In the economy of the opinion media were used as "image" of a democratic process that but simply never took place. It is almost a point, why Wikileaks is now more than necessary.
should really join the SZ so those newspapers that reflect Wikileaks site and every day to provide a thorough analysis of the leaked information and put it in current Zusammenhäge, instead of complaining that Wikileaks just does not (can not do).
to the point the system question is: What can
the "traditional media" from the mirror-judgment of 5 August 1966 and the Judgement of 27 Cicero- February 2007 to really get to the 4th to form pillar of democracy?
0 comments:
Post a Comment