Wednesday, December 22, 2010
How To Fix Software Exception C0000005 In Tally
The irony of it all - Happy new leaks! The Sueddeutsche Zeitung
Sunday, December 19, 2010
Tiffany Towers What Happend
Electronic citizen participation in the representative system (low cooperation)
Felicitas Schoenherr
"strengthens democracy through the Internet, new ways to become politically informed, get involved and organize in groups or weakens democracy by for individualization of information and communication flows and thereby leads to the splitting of society "(Internet & Society Collaboraty: 2010)?. That quote illustrates the diversity that raises the issue of electronic public participation in the representative system. " The need of the population for more say in relation to public issues, is reflected currently in the Baden-Wuerttemberg protest "Stuttgart 21" again, to name just one example of the relevance of the topic. Electronic citizen participation could be both at local and national level, the opportunity to meet that need. This could lead to greater acceptance of each of the decisions taken by citizens, the local sense of belonging could also be strengthened and increased participation in decision-making could lead to any qualitative improvement. Nothing, despite the more, The following examples show the e-petition and e-consultation that takes place despite the lower participation effort, only a small civic participation. In the next section, these examples are presented, but first a brief comment follows the "classical" petition and consultation in order to classify the electronic equivalent of better.
consultations in the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG)
The word consultation is Latin and refers to the collection of information and advice from political decisions that a state make their own needs, but no legal right to co is granted. Consultations are available in the FRG in formal and informal in shape. Legally required participation procedures can be found mainly in urban development planning that will ensure that the public is given room for expression, said to have said as not binding.
petitions in Germany
petitions formulated in writing designate a command, complaint or a request to a government agency or parliament, enshrined since 1949 in Article 17 of the Basic Act as a fundamental right of every citizen. This is to ensure that every citizen, regardless of its status, the ability to has to be able to contribute his opinion in a political debate. A petition may be filed either by an individual as well as a group at the respective Petition Committee, the petitioner has no claim to the implementation of its concern.
e-consultation portal on the example of the civil law
The e-consultation, the Federal Ministry of the Interior tried to open a channel to channel criticism of the concept of de-mail. The e-consultation took place over 3.5 weeks, while the site was accessed almost 12,000 times and it was written 350 posts. Although there on the website good opportunities was to gain information on the Citizens Portal Act, such as the possible questions to write a review to download the bill or in a live chat with project director citizen portals, ask questions, participation was rather low. Sun led just about 70 reviews for real substantive changes in the civil law portal. But you have been observed here that this is likely acted to people who does have knowledge, but without the possibility of e-consultation is not perceived as such and would have so it does not change the law to obtain. The method allows the e-consultation, including experts who are not perceived as such, to achieve improvements in their knowledge. Even if the e-consultation has not received a great response, it has been achieved, the very people who wanted to reach them. However, found in an e-consultation no real exchange instead, because communication tends strongly in one direction. Thus, only the most common questions answered and included only those improvements that are consistent with the views of the legislature.
discussion
In the ensuing discussion, it is gone mainly to the possible impact of non-binding, which include the examples of electronic citizenship. influence, the question has been raised in this case includes, in particular, whether the citizens are held by the non-binding nature of their contributions from a participation contribute because they feel nothing and have to seriously. The opinion of the plenary is rather gone in the direction that the people who want to participate do so and are not held by the non-binding it. 
Felicitas Schoenherr
"strengthens democracy through the Internet, new ways to become politically informed, get involved and organize in groups or weakens democracy by for individualization of information and communication flows and thereby leads to the splitting of society "(Internet & Society Collaboraty: 2010)?. That quote illustrates the diversity that raises the issue of electronic public participation in the representative system. " The need of the population for more say in relation to public issues, is reflected currently in the Baden-Wuerttemberg protest "Stuttgart 21" again, to name just one example of the relevance of the topic. Electronic citizen participation could be both at local and national level, the opportunity to meet that need. This could lead to greater acceptance of each of the decisions taken by citizens, the local sense of belonging could also be strengthened and increased participation in decision-making could lead to any qualitative improvement. Nothing, despite the more, The following examples show the e-petition and e-consultation that takes place despite the lower participation effort, only a small civic participation. In the next section, these examples are presented, but first a brief comment follows the "classical" petition and consultation in order to classify the electronic equivalent of better.
consultations in the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG)
The word consultation is Latin and refers to the collection of information and advice from political decisions that a state make their own needs, but no legal right to co is granted. Consultations are available in the FRG in formal and informal in shape. Legally required participation procedures can be found mainly in urban development planning that will ensure that the public is given room for expression, said to have said as not binding.
petitions in Germany
petitions formulated in writing designate a command, complaint or a request to a government agency or parliament, enshrined since 1949 in Article 17 of the Basic Act as a fundamental right of every citizen. This is to ensure that every citizen, regardless of its status, the ability to has to be able to contribute his opinion in a political debate. A petition may be filed either by an individual as well as a group at the respective Petition Committee, the petitioner has no claim to the implementation of its concern.
e-consultation portal on the example of the civil law
The e-consultation, the Federal Ministry of the Interior tried to open a channel to channel criticism of the concept of de-mail. The e-consultation took place over 3.5 weeks, while the site was accessed almost 12,000 times and it was written 350 posts. Although there on the website good opportunities was to gain information on the Citizens Portal Act, such as the possible questions to write a review to download the bill or in a live chat with project director citizen portals, ask questions, participation was rather low. Sun led just about 70 reviews for real substantive changes in the civil law portal. But you have been observed here that this is likely acted to people who does have knowledge, but without the possibility of e-consultation is not perceived as such and would have so it does not change the law to obtain. The method allows the e-consultation, including experts who are not perceived as such, to achieve improvements in their knowledge. Even if the e-consultation has not received a great response, it has been achieved, the very people who wanted to reach them. However, found in an e-consultation no real exchange instead, because communication tends strongly in one direction. Thus, only the most common questions answered and included only those improvements that are consistent with the views of the legislature.
discussion
In the ensuing discussion, it is gone mainly to the possible impact of non-binding, which include the examples of electronic citizenship. influence, the question has been raised in this case includes, in particular, whether the citizens are held by the non-binding nature of their contributions from a participation contribute because they feel nothing and have to seriously. The opinion of the plenary is rather gone in the direction that the people who want to participate do so and are not held by the non-binding it.
Thursday, December 16, 2010
How To Make A Report Card 5 Years Old
Electronic citizen participation in the representative system (Mean cooperation )
Claudia Lorenz, Susanne Vogt and Halina Klischat
Claudia Lorenz, Susanne Vogt and Halina Klischat
with electronic methods of citizen participation can decision-making processes more open and transparent. This can be increased for a project to the public the relevance and credibility. And the use of digital media easier enables citizens to participate in policy-making and increase efficiency on the part of the administration.
The following three examples of e-participation in the central co-presented, that citizens can make proposals and opinions, but politics is in its final decision not bound by it. For this opens up the possibility for policy to help the people a new information and knowledge base to generate. Viewed
redesign of the Hamburg Cathedral Square Cathedral Square Historically an important role for Hamburg. He is the geographical center of the city and it was assumed here a long time, the location of the Hamma Burg, Hamburg its name was. According to the different structural use, the area most recently served as a parking lot. In recent years there have been ideas and architectural competitions whose results have not been implemented. After 2005, the design of a glass building strong protest had the effect of the population, they decided on an Internet discussion, from 29.05. was carried out until 14.06.2007.
This one uses the DEMOS method which is based on a project funded by the European Commission for research and development project. Implemented by TuTech GmbH This process is a results-oriented discussion course edit and save any conflicts promptly. The motivation of potential participants is paramount. The discussion is divided into 3 phases: (1) development of the central topics of discussion, (2) enhance the discussion and development of problem-solving strategies, (3) consolidation of the debate - followed by presentation of the results in a final report .
In the introductory phase, users could "their cathedral square" shape with the help of a map and aerial images themselves. These designs could then be recovered from all users in the following comments and complements. Accompanying supervised a team of presenters and the discussions summarized the current results for a better view. Should provide for additional share live discussions with politicians and leaders of the planning authority. In addition, prominent Hamburg promoted the Internet discussion of a higher media presence to achieve.
was a result there are 27 concrete proposals and use the "desire for a tangible public and freely available ... loose and delicately built, or even completely undeveloped Cathedral Square. The 285 registered participants of the discussion were the largest Part between 30 and 64 years and had a higher level of education. Moreover, the urban districts were slightly above presented.
The redesigned Cathedral Square was opened in May 2007. The campaigns designs were not implemented directly, but only the desire for a clear and stressing the historical importance of this place. The cost of the renovation was around 1.2 million euros. Nevertheless, the current approach is only a temporary solution that should probably calm the highly charged debate over the use first.
Citizens Budget Cologne Using participatory budgeting are in financial planning knowledge and opinions of the citizens are used, this should create more transparency and promote citizen participation in political processes. Model for participatory budgeting in Germany, including the Citizens Budget Porto Alegre, there was carried out with the electoral victory of a leftist party in 1989 the citizen's first budget. 15% of citizens took part in election stakeholders (100,000 citizens). Anyone could take part in community meetings, which were used 10000-20000 citizens. At the town meetings and government administration presented their work before, citizens could make suggestions and comment. In Porto Alegre, improved infrastructure, and the number of illiterates, the nepotism and corruption reduced.
In Cologne 2007, the first participatory budgeting was done here was very much focused on the Internet. The Finance Committee of Cologne were the themes of "Sports", "green areas", "roads, streets and squares" free choice of topics based on a survey among the citizens of Cologne. On the Internet could develop suggestions, comments reviewed, (Support / Reject) be. At a call center in Cologne have also received proposals. At the beginning of the civil budget proposal went with a circular arches on all households in Cologne on which proposals could also be formulated. The proposals of the arches and received in Cologne, call centers were also posted on the Internet and were able to be commented on and evaluated. A total of 5,000 suggestions were received, 9,000 comments and 50,000 evaluations that rated 100 were presented to the Parliament, explained that his decision later on the internet. In particular, the infrastructure of Cologne has changed through the participatory budget (cycle lanes). Main part have involved men aged 35-55 years with a high level of education, therefore, participation is not representative.
participatory budgeting (Participatory budgeting) in the UK The participatory budget was the beginning of the millennium by Hazel Blears (former Secretary of State for civic and community affairs), a catchment. It features two characteristics. On the one hand he is between community development, whose goal is to transfer civil society organizations selbstdurchzuführende services and to settle public private partnerships. The second feature is the system of participatory budgeting, as evidenced by traditional methods, eg composed Consultative forums, interactive web sites, citizen juries (Plan cells): Question and answer sessions in the Council and of modern methods, for example.
An example is the "Vote For Your Park" campaign in London in 2008 where citizens could vote for one of the 47 parks to choose from on the Internet, by SMS or mail. The aim of the vote, the distribution of public funds (£ 400,000) for the beautification of the parks with the most votes. First, it is positive assess that the citizens would be able to participate in the use of public funds. But you have to narrow down the back, because the way the pure vote, does not generate discussion among the citizens. Multiple Voting Voting distorted a fair result, the danger that Parks 'win' in a socially more districts is quite high. This can lead to spatial disparities.
Another example is the Citizens Panel be consulted on the regular 500 to 2500 a representative sample of citizens, in a period of 3 to 4 years on specific topics. The goal of a citizen panel is the generation of views among the broadest possible citizenship. The surveyed citizens should also be involved in more deliberative participation process. There is an opportunity, for people who deal regularly with
certain problems in their region and are asked to show a greater willingness to participate in this area for further action (eg: workshops, citizen jury, etc.). In e-panels such as "YouGov" registered user being interviewed via the Internet by the same research institute. Commissioned the survey to come out of politics or for market and social research.
future
In June 2010 the database was "Coins-Combined Online Information System found online. Using this database, it is possible to every citizen in the UK to see the government spending, one can determine to whom or for which funds flow projects. Now methods must be found to process this information and possibly develop new efficient methods for participatory budgeting. Furthermore, 2012 will be introduced in each community the participatory budgeting.
sources
Cathedral Square
hamburg.de GmbH & Co. KG, on-line at: http://www.hamburg.de/pressearchiv-
fhh/nofl/1449420/domplatz-tagansicht.html, Stand: 03.12.2010
TuTech Innovation GmbH, 2007, report to the Hamburg-line discussion "reconfiguration of the Hamburg Cathedral Square"
TuTech Innovation GmbH, online at:
http://tutech.net/root/tutech.tu tech.net / microsites / IK / text / internet discourse / DEMOS concept / text / Procedures ? / object sessionid = & language = en Stand: 11.25.2010
Citizens Budget Cologne: https: / / buergerhaushalt.stadt-koeln.de/2010/index.php
participatory budgeting in the UK: http://www.buergerhaushalt .org / press clippings / more-than-one-organize Tea Party /
http://books.google.de/books?id=tEV5NLvbj34C&pg=PA214&lpg=PA214&dq=b%C3%BCrgerhaushalt+gro%C3%
9Fbritannien&source=bl&ots=KDHo5_UQoo&sig=bj_Yi8OCTazVo9Sy6MimKwDnZgw&hl=de&ei=IR35TKDdCo2f
Oujd2NQK&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CB8Q6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=b%C3%BCrgerhaushalt%20gro%C3%9Fbritannien&f=false
http://digitalgovernment.wordpress.com/2010/12/02/ein-e-government-pionier-der-shared-services-und-des-burgerhaushalts/
http://www.buergerhaushalt.org/tag/groszbritannien/
http://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/bst/de/media/xcms_bst_dms_32426_32427_2.pdf
The following three examples of e-participation in the central co-presented, that citizens can make proposals and opinions, but politics is in its final decision not bound by it. For this opens up the possibility for policy to help the people a new information and knowledge base to generate. Viewed
redesign of the Hamburg Cathedral Square Cathedral Square Historically an important role for Hamburg. He is the geographical center of the city and it was assumed here a long time, the location of the Hamma Burg, Hamburg its name was. According to the different structural use, the area most recently served as a parking lot. In recent years there have been ideas and architectural competitions whose results have not been implemented. After 2005, the design of a glass building strong protest had the effect of the population, they decided on an Internet discussion, from 29.05. was carried out until 14.06.2007.
This one uses the DEMOS method which is based on a project funded by the European Commission for research and development project. Implemented by TuTech GmbH This process is a results-oriented discussion course edit and save any conflicts promptly. The motivation of potential participants is paramount. The discussion is divided into 3 phases: (1) development of the central topics of discussion, (2) enhance the discussion and development of problem-solving strategies, (3) consolidation of the debate - followed by presentation of the results in a final report .
In the introductory phase, users could "their cathedral square" shape with the help of a map and aerial images themselves. These designs could then be recovered from all users in the following comments and complements. Accompanying supervised a team of presenters and the discussions summarized the current results for a better view. Should provide for additional share live discussions with politicians and leaders of the planning authority. In addition, prominent Hamburg promoted the Internet discussion of a higher media presence to achieve.
was a result there are 27 concrete proposals and use the "desire for a tangible public and freely available ... loose and delicately built, or even completely undeveloped Cathedral Square. The 285 registered participants of the discussion were the largest Part between 30 and 64 years and had a higher level of education. Moreover, the urban districts were slightly above presented.
The redesigned Cathedral Square was opened in May 2007. The campaigns designs were not implemented directly, but only the desire for a clear and stressing the historical importance of this place. The cost of the renovation was around 1.2 million euros. Nevertheless, the current approach is only a temporary solution that should probably calm the highly charged debate over the use first.
Citizens Budget Cologne Using participatory budgeting are in financial planning knowledge and opinions of the citizens are used, this should create more transparency and promote citizen participation in political processes. Model for participatory budgeting in Germany, including the Citizens Budget Porto Alegre, there was carried out with the electoral victory of a leftist party in 1989 the citizen's first budget. 15% of citizens took part in election stakeholders (100,000 citizens). Anyone could take part in community meetings, which were used 10000-20000 citizens. At the town meetings and government administration presented their work before, citizens could make suggestions and comment. In Porto Alegre, improved infrastructure, and the number of illiterates, the nepotism and corruption reduced.
In Cologne 2007, the first participatory budgeting was done here was very much focused on the Internet. The Finance Committee of Cologne were the themes of "Sports", "green areas", "roads, streets and squares" free choice of topics based on a survey among the citizens of Cologne. On the Internet could develop suggestions, comments reviewed, (Support / Reject) be. At a call center in Cologne have also received proposals. At the beginning of the civil budget proposal went with a circular arches on all households in Cologne on which proposals could also be formulated. The proposals of the arches and received in Cologne, call centers were also posted on the Internet and were able to be commented on and evaluated. A total of 5,000 suggestions were received, 9,000 comments and 50,000 evaluations that rated 100 were presented to the Parliament, explained that his decision later on the internet. In particular, the infrastructure of Cologne has changed through the participatory budget (cycle lanes). Main part have involved men aged 35-55 years with a high level of education, therefore, participation is not representative.
participatory budgeting (Participatory budgeting) in the UK The participatory budget was the beginning of the millennium by Hazel Blears (former Secretary of State for civic and community affairs), a catchment. It features two characteristics. On the one hand he is between community development, whose goal is to transfer civil society organizations selbstdurchzuführende services and to settle public private partnerships. The second feature is the system of participatory budgeting, as evidenced by traditional methods, eg composed Consultative forums, interactive web sites, citizen juries (Plan cells): Question and answer sessions in the Council and of modern methods, for example.
An example is the "Vote For Your Park" campaign in London in 2008 where citizens could vote for one of the 47 parks to choose from on the Internet, by SMS or mail. The aim of the vote, the distribution of public funds (£ 400,000) for the beautification of the parks with the most votes. First, it is positive assess that the citizens would be able to participate in the use of public funds. But you have to narrow down the back, because the way the pure vote, does not generate discussion among the citizens. Multiple Voting Voting distorted a fair result, the danger that Parks 'win' in a socially more districts is quite high. This can lead to spatial disparities.
Another example is the Citizens Panel be consulted on the regular 500 to 2500 a representative sample of citizens, in a period of 3 to 4 years on specific topics. The goal of a citizen panel is the generation of views among the broadest possible citizenship. The surveyed citizens should also be involved in more deliberative participation process. There is an opportunity, for people who deal regularly with
certain problems in their region and are asked to show a greater willingness to participate in this area for further action (eg: workshops, citizen jury, etc.). In e-panels such as "YouGov" registered user being interviewed via the Internet by the same research institute. Commissioned the survey to come out of politics or for market and social research.
future
In June 2010 the database was "Coins-Combined Online Information System found online. Using this database, it is possible to every citizen in the UK to see the government spending, one can determine to whom or for which funds flow projects. Now methods must be found to process this information and possibly develop new efficient methods for participatory budgeting. Furthermore, 2012 will be introduced in each community the participatory budgeting.
sources
Cathedral Square
hamburg.de GmbH & Co. KG, on-line at: http://www.hamburg.de/pressearchiv-
fhh/nofl/1449420/domplatz-tagansicht.html, Stand: 03.12.2010
TuTech Innovation GmbH, 2007, report to the Hamburg-line discussion "reconfiguration of the Hamburg Cathedral Square"
TuTech Innovation GmbH, online at:
http://tutech.net/root/tutech.tu tech.net / microsites / IK / text / internet discourse / DEMOS concept / text / Procedures ? / object sessionid = & language = en Stand: 11.25.2010
Citizens Budget Cologne: https: / / buergerhaushalt.stadt-koeln.de/2010/index.php
participatory budgeting in the UK: http://www.buergerhaushalt .org / press clippings / more-than-one-organize Tea Party /
http://books.google.de/books?id=tEV5NLvbj34C&pg=PA214&lpg=PA214&dq=b%C3%BCrgerhaushalt+gro%C3%
9Fbritannien&source=bl&ots=KDHo5_UQoo&sig=bj_Yi8OCTazVo9Sy6MimKwDnZgw&hl=de&ei=IR35TKDdCo2f
Oujd2NQK&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CB8Q6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=b%C3%BCrgerhaushalt%20gro%C3%9Fbritannien&f=false
http://digitalgovernment.wordpress.com/2010/12/02/ein-e-government-pionier-der-shared-services-und-des-burgerhaushalts/
http://www.buergerhaushalt.org/tag/groszbritannien/
http://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/bst/de/media/xcms_bst_dms_32426_32427_2.pdf
Monday, December 13, 2010
Invitation Card Hindi Matter
and system question
comment on article revelations and Ethics Wikileaks and the systemic question of 12/11/2010, by Hans Leyendecker.
The question "What message are reports prove to whom?" should not be made by the SZ, but are determined according to the present by Wikileaks information!
should go the "traditional" media about finding a position between between "embedded journalism" and Wikileaks, which is more than just feuilletonistic reasoning about generational conflicts.
In this context, the introduction of the article "Wikileaks and the system question "a little irritating. The speculation that the second Iraq war would be broken if the" informational Vandals "by Wikileaks would have struck even then leads, in view of the fact that the UN Security Council has been lied to justify the United States, in the void . The "truth", with or without Wikileaks, Collin Powell, with a cheap Photoshop fiction of mobile weapons of mass destruction delivered it himself.
is important is the fact that at that time the voices of millions of citizens who were protesting in the streets all over the world, however, , were simply ignored. In the economy of the opinion media were used as "image" of a democratic process that but simply never took place. It is almost a point, why Wikileaks is now more than necessary.
should really join the SZ so those newspapers that reflect Wikileaks site and every day to provide a thorough analysis of the leaked information and put it in current Zusammenhäge, instead of complaining that Wikileaks just does not (can not do).
to the point the system question is: What can
the "traditional media" from the mirror-judgment of 5 August 1966 and the Judgement of 27 Cicero- February 2007 to really get to the 4th to form pillar of democracy? 
comment on article revelations and Ethics Wikileaks and the systemic question of 12/11/2010, by Hans Leyendecker.
The question "What message are reports prove to whom?" should not be made by the SZ, but are determined according to the present by Wikileaks information!
should go the "traditional" media about finding a position between between "embedded journalism" and Wikileaks, which is more than just feuilletonistic reasoning about generational conflicts.
In this context, the introduction of the article "Wikileaks and the system question "a little irritating. The speculation that the second Iraq war would be broken if the" informational Vandals "by Wikileaks would have struck even then leads, in view of the fact that the UN Security Council has been lied to justify the United States, in the void . The "truth", with or without Wikileaks, Collin Powell, with a cheap Photoshop fiction of mobile weapons of mass destruction delivered it himself.
is important is the fact that at that time the voices of millions of citizens who were protesting in the streets all over the world, however, , were simply ignored. In the economy of the opinion media were used as "image" of a democratic process that but simply never took place. It is almost a point, why Wikileaks is now more than necessary.
should really join the SZ so those newspapers that reflect Wikileaks site and every day to provide a thorough analysis of the leaked information and put it in current Zusammenhäge, instead of complaining that Wikileaks just does not (can not do).
to the point the system question is: What can
the "traditional media" from the mirror-judgment of 5 August 1966 and the Judgement of 27 Cicero- February 2007 to really get to the 4th to form pillar of democracy?
Sunday, December 12, 2010
Baitbus Movie Watch Online
summary of the Office of Open Data
Lisa Denzer Yulia Belousova and Anna Eva Rathje
called basic idea of Open Data Open Data
the idea that would take place with free access to data, a positive use and development. Free access means, both the general availability of the data, as well as their ease of use (machine readability). Open Government
8 principles
first Completeness
second Primary source
3. Timely
4th Accessible
5th Machine Readable
6th Non-discriminatory
7th Not proprietary
8th Royalty Free
claim of Open Data
demand for innovation, ie, with open-access scientific knowledge, research can be further promoted.
public claim, ie, with publication dates of the authorities, there is improved control of public resources
issues of Open Data
obstacles of the Open Data movement is, in addition to the technical component, especially the privacy.
closed formats (such as PDF) and hinder Copyrights often have a smooth distribution and use of the data.
is focusing currently on the legality of the published data, particularly personal information (see EU agricultural subsidies). The most famous, yet decisive, no doubt the debate is to Wikileaks.
Examples of Open Data
-Open Haushalt.de the preparation of data from the Federal Statistics Office.
OpenStreetMap-the creation of a free world map, without license costs.
-TheyWorkForYou Here is the voting patterns of British MPs to pursue.
sources
http://linkeddata.org
http://opendata.hackday.net
https: / / www-genesis.destatis.de/genesis/online
http://blogs.talis.com/nodalities/2007/ 11/who_is_afraid_of_the_ggg.php
http://richard.cyganiak.de/2007/10/lod/
http://opendata-network.org/network/
http://www.ref.gv.at/Open- Government-Let-the-http://blog.zeit.de/open-data/2010/11/11/transparenz-eu-agrarsubventionen suns.opengovernment.0.html
http://www.bundestagger.de/
-stopped / 
Lisa Denzer Yulia Belousova and Anna Eva Rathje
the idea that would take place with free access to data, a positive use and development. Free access means, both the general availability of the data, as well as their ease of use (machine readability). Open Government
8 principles
first Completeness
second Primary source
3. Timely
4th Accessible
5th Machine Readable
6th Non-discriminatory
7th Not proprietary
8th Royalty Free
claim of Open Data
demand for innovation, ie, with open-access scientific knowledge, research can be further promoted.
public claim, ie, with publication dates of the authorities, there is improved control of public resources
issues of Open Data
obstacles of the Open Data movement is, in addition to the technical component, especially the privacy.
closed formats (such as PDF) and hinder Copyrights often have a smooth distribution and use of the data.
is focusing currently on the legality of the published data, particularly personal information (see EU agricultural subsidies). The most famous, yet decisive, no doubt the debate is to Wikileaks.
Examples of Open Data
-Open Haushalt.de the preparation of data from the Federal Statistics Office.
OpenStreetMap-the creation of a free world map, without license costs.
-TheyWorkForYou Here is the voting patterns of British MPs to pursue.
sources
http://linkeddata.org
http://opendata.hackday.net
https: / / www-genesis.destatis.de/genesis/online
http://blogs.talis.com/nodalities/2007/ 11/who_is_afraid_of_the_ggg.php
http://richard.cyganiak.de/2007/10/lod/
http://opendata-network.org/network/
http://www.ref.gv.at/Open- Government-Let-the-http://blog.zeit.de/open-data/2010/11/11/transparenz-eu-agrarsubventionen suns.opengovernment.0.html
http://www.bundestagger.de/
-stopped /
Thursday, December 9, 2010
How Long Does It Take For Sypilis To Show
The right game at the wrong game: Wikileaks help!
Here is an interesting Article I take the liberty of copying LawBlog Udo Vetter. ;-) I hope this is clear, but the review provides some clarity on the question of whether one may now help Wikileaks or not. It is the nature of the case that all attempts to criminalize not only Wikileaks, but also those who want to support Wikileaks. The question of whether we like it because it was importance to freedom of press, freedom of expression puts an open question. Here is the link to LawBlog
http://www.lawblog.de/index.php/archives/2010/12/07/kriegsgerat-serverplatz/
12/07/2010
military equipment
A free server space, not guided by the public authority, subjected to censorship press is an essential element of a free State, in particular, is a free, regularly published political press for modern democracy is indispensable. Should citizens make political decisions, he must be fully informed, but also know the opinions and can weigh up to today, the others have formed. The press keeps this constant discussion going, they obtained the information himself takes this position and thus acts as an orienting force in the public debate. In it is articulated public opinion.
Federal Constitutional Court, Judgement of 5 mirror August 1966 Link
The above four sets are now 44 years old. However, they actually contain all the answers to the questions facing us Germans in the WikiLeaks debate.
A question would be, for example, that German politicians, despite the steep templates from the U.S. are remarkably restrained in it, the editors of the Mirror, which further put the U.S. diplomat end Peschen the German public, to move into the vicinity of cyber-terrorism or treason.
Simply because they know that anyone who tried again to Franz-Josef Strauss, has taken a bloody nose. Recent those were the investigators, which felts the Cicero-editing, because they arrive in the trail of a mole in the Federal wanted. Aid to the mystery of the betrayal was accused Cicero journalists. An evil construct simply because disclosure of secrets can commit only a civil servant. This has the Federal Constitutional Court then dissected in a new decision in principle on press freedom very painful for those responsible.
The judges made clear that searches and seizures by the press members are not permitted if they are exclusively or primarily the purpose to determine the identity of the informant (Cicero, Judgement of 27 February 2007). Link
These are milestones.
But beyond that found from the Spiegel Affair to Cicero in all decisions of the Federal Constitutional Court on a clear message that the press should just rely on the information that superficially adheres to the stigma of illegal immigrants. There are simply not reporting ban on leaked documents from government ministries, political groups, intelligence services and police authorities, these may be two or three times as "confidentially" or even "secret" stamped.
are decisions of the Federal Constitutional Court has clearly read that the press of their role as 4th Violence in general is just only if they abnudelt not only press releases from politics, administration and courts. No, they can and should connect to other authorities on their feet by just information leakage used to bring the uncomfortable things to light. For the first meets the press the claim of the citizen to "full information", through the true state of the society in which he lives. Press freedom also includes the entire value chain. Informants and protection of sources are therefore no phrases from spy movies, but solid legal reality.
Thus, no one put away as the editors of the Mirror for their "revelations", so little you could do it with the makers in Germany by WikiLeaks.
The only uncertainty was whether WikiLeaks really "press" is. It is for me but no doubt. Although limited the activity of the documentation on WikiLeaks. But just the documentation is a core function of journalism. Moreover, times are changing. The Internet now allows even bought a brand new journalism by facts. Because there are different from print media no limits on the amount of information and no limitation of the public. WikiLeaks has grasped the first, it reacted brilliantly and so probably the world's currently most talked about and made probably the most important medium of all.
The policy response speaks for itself anyway.
The country of origin of the message dispatches, is stupid enough in itself, nor haven of almost unlimited freedom of expression. But rather then to be proud to take matters to keep fit and perhaps in secret to grind their teeth, demanding U.S. politicians and even newspaper journalists disclosed the death of the Front Runners Julian Assange, the classification of WikiLeaks as a terrorist organization and a law shortly Whistleblowing times each, to the detriment of the United States is under severe penalties. Moreover
should have led the first government pressure to dry out that private companies such as Amazon, PayPal, Mastercard and Visa now WikiLeaks remove the space and financial channels. Which is probably due to the remaining national freedom not a U.S. court would have approved is so on the terms and conditions implemented by companies. This not even seriously laminated Foul Play is likely to cost the U.S. in the long term probably more sympathetic than they already were losing by not more unstoppable message dispatches ever.
If it still goes merrily on, could maybe even meet dramatic visions. For example, those that WikiLeaks could be the trigger of a war that is fought on the battlefield Internet. On one side of the front of governments and companies that want to reverse the loss of control over the Internet. On the other hand their own citizens who can not like this and in turn take up arms - keyboard, technology understanding, Data lines and space. The call to make
WikiLeaks, the page on as many computers simultaneously available could be the first real mobilization of the non-governmental side of this conflict go down in history. The question of the risks of foot soldiers in this case to answer in my view, quite simple. There are no significant, if you can live with that, maybe more to get a visa for the USA.
is some places, yes even whispered, who helps WikiLeaks could possibly make a criminal offense, because he reveals state secrets, or even committing treason. This is where once again looking back. The Spiegel quoted in its historical title of "affective ready for defense "of internal government documents. Although the judges discussed the possibility to render the external security of the Federal Republic was threatened, but even they saw no purpose in Rudolf Augstein and his editors in the direction of a treason.
It should also be in the WikiLeaks documents. It is the parties give priority to the detection of irregularities and (unknown) political mechanisms, not about the security of the state to inflict a severe disadvantage. Where else to say this is that the thrust of the relevant penal provisions to acts detrimental to Germany's. The U.S. and France are at most about the international applicability of German criminal law included. But it requires some legal acrobatics. Cicero would approve.
A state secret is only as long as a state secret, as it is secret. Previously published information are therefore no longer a secret. It also raises the question whether someone who provides the server space available, the content of a user does at all its own and personally liable. Under German law is one of accommodation of other data provider. As such, it adheres the first place, nor for the content of his "clients" as the commercial provider, in which the server is rented.
In this context, may be quite the hat to those German providers prefer to not walk the way from Amazon, Paypal, Mastercard and Visa. Many providers are now expressly stated that they will not cancel, therefore the customer contract because support this WikiLeaks. Those who
be damaged by hail, the provider itself would not privilege, should his "guest" give free rein as possible on the server. Conversely, those who independently decide what content should take the "guest" on the server makes through testing and release its contents. This leads quickly according to their own liability.
uncertainty remains as yet the copyright. At least for the non-affected Audience, it would of course be an attractive idea that Hillary Clinton at the regional court of Hamburg says. It should, however, significant setbacks for the U.S. administration will be necessary before it embarks on this smooth terrain. Slippery because documents are protected by copyright authorities in the U.S. and Germany, much less, say, the script for the television series "24".
This is not a call to go to war. But no warning before it. 
Here is an interesting Article I take the liberty of copying LawBlog Udo Vetter. ;-) I hope this is clear, but the review provides some clarity on the question of whether one may now help Wikileaks or not. It is the nature of the case that all attempts to criminalize not only Wikileaks, but also those who want to support Wikileaks. The question of whether we like it because it was importance to freedom of press, freedom of expression puts an open question. Here is the link to LawBlog
http://www.lawblog.de/index.php/archives/2010/12/07/kriegsgerat-serverplatz/
12/07/2010
military equipment
A free server space, not guided by the public authority, subjected to censorship press is an essential element of a free State, in particular, is a free, regularly published political press for modern democracy is indispensable. Should citizens make political decisions, he must be fully informed, but also know the opinions and can weigh up to today, the others have formed. The press keeps this constant discussion going, they obtained the information himself takes this position and thus acts as an orienting force in the public debate. In it is articulated public opinion.
Federal Constitutional Court, Judgement of 5 mirror August 1966 Link
The above four sets are now 44 years old. However, they actually contain all the answers to the questions facing us Germans in the WikiLeaks debate.
A question would be, for example, that German politicians, despite the steep templates from the U.S. are remarkably restrained in it, the editors of the Mirror, which further put the U.S. diplomat end Peschen the German public, to move into the vicinity of cyber-terrorism or treason.
Simply because they know that anyone who tried again to Franz-Josef Strauss, has taken a bloody nose. Recent those were the investigators, which felts the Cicero-editing, because they arrive in the trail of a mole in the Federal wanted. Aid to the mystery of the betrayal was accused Cicero journalists. An evil construct simply because disclosure of secrets can commit only a civil servant. This has the Federal Constitutional Court then dissected in a new decision in principle on press freedom very painful for those responsible.
The judges made clear that searches and seizures by the press members are not permitted if they are exclusively or primarily the purpose to determine the identity of the informant (Cicero, Judgement of 27 February 2007). Link
These are milestones.
But beyond that found from the Spiegel Affair to Cicero in all decisions of the Federal Constitutional Court on a clear message that the press should just rely on the information that superficially adheres to the stigma of illegal immigrants. There are simply not reporting ban on leaked documents from government ministries, political groups, intelligence services and police authorities, these may be two or three times as "confidentially" or even "secret" stamped.
are decisions of the Federal Constitutional Court has clearly read that the press of their role as 4th Violence in general is just only if they abnudelt not only press releases from politics, administration and courts. No, they can and should connect to other authorities on their feet by just information leakage used to bring the uncomfortable things to light. For the first meets the press the claim of the citizen to "full information", through the true state of the society in which he lives. Press freedom also includes the entire value chain. Informants and protection of sources are therefore no phrases from spy movies, but solid legal reality.
Thus, no one put away as the editors of the Mirror for their "revelations", so little you could do it with the makers in Germany by WikiLeaks.
The only uncertainty was whether WikiLeaks really "press" is. It is for me but no doubt. Although limited the activity of the documentation on WikiLeaks. But just the documentation is a core function of journalism. Moreover, times are changing. The Internet now allows even bought a brand new journalism by facts. Because there are different from print media no limits on the amount of information and no limitation of the public. WikiLeaks has grasped the first, it reacted brilliantly and so probably the world's currently most talked about and made probably the most important medium of all.
The policy response speaks for itself anyway.
The country of origin of the message dispatches, is stupid enough in itself, nor haven of almost unlimited freedom of expression. But rather then to be proud to take matters to keep fit and perhaps in secret to grind their teeth, demanding U.S. politicians and even newspaper journalists disclosed the death of the Front Runners Julian Assange, the classification of WikiLeaks as a terrorist organization and a law shortly Whistleblowing times each, to the detriment of the United States is under severe penalties. Moreover
should have led the first government pressure to dry out that private companies such as Amazon, PayPal, Mastercard and Visa now WikiLeaks remove the space and financial channels. Which is probably due to the remaining national freedom not a U.S. court would have approved is so on the terms and conditions implemented by companies. This not even seriously laminated Foul Play is likely to cost the U.S. in the long term probably more sympathetic than they already were losing by not more unstoppable message dispatches ever.
If it still goes merrily on, could maybe even meet dramatic visions. For example, those that WikiLeaks could be the trigger of a war that is fought on the battlefield Internet. On one side of the front of governments and companies that want to reverse the loss of control over the Internet. On the other hand their own citizens who can not like this and in turn take up arms - keyboard, technology understanding, Data lines and space. The call to make
WikiLeaks, the page on as many computers simultaneously available could be the first real mobilization of the non-governmental side of this conflict go down in history. The question of the risks of foot soldiers in this case to answer in my view, quite simple. There are no significant, if you can live with that, maybe more to get a visa for the USA.
is some places, yes even whispered, who helps WikiLeaks could possibly make a criminal offense, because he reveals state secrets, or even committing treason. This is where once again looking back. The Spiegel quoted in its historical title of "affective ready for defense "of internal government documents. Although the judges discussed the possibility to render the external security of the Federal Republic was threatened, but even they saw no purpose in Rudolf Augstein and his editors in the direction of a treason.
It should also be in the WikiLeaks documents. It is the parties give priority to the detection of irregularities and (unknown) political mechanisms, not about the security of the state to inflict a severe disadvantage. Where else to say this is that the thrust of the relevant penal provisions to acts detrimental to Germany's. The U.S. and France are at most about the international applicability of German criminal law included. But it requires some legal acrobatics. Cicero would approve.
A state secret is only as long as a state secret, as it is secret. Previously published information are therefore no longer a secret. It also raises the question whether someone who provides the server space available, the content of a user does at all its own and personally liable. Under German law is one of accommodation of other data provider. As such, it adheres the first place, nor for the content of his "clients" as the commercial provider, in which the server is rented.
In this context, may be quite the hat to those German providers prefer to not walk the way from Amazon, Paypal, Mastercard and Visa. Many providers are now expressly stated that they will not cancel, therefore the customer contract because support this WikiLeaks. Those who
be damaged by hail, the provider itself would not privilege, should his "guest" give free rein as possible on the server. Conversely, those who independently decide what content should take the "guest" on the server makes through testing and release its contents. This leads quickly according to their own liability.
uncertainty remains as yet the copyright. At least for the non-affected Audience, it would of course be an attractive idea that Hillary Clinton at the regional court of Hamburg says. It should, however, significant setbacks for the U.S. administration will be necessary before it embarks on this smooth terrain. Slippery because documents are protected by copyright authorities in the U.S. and Germany, much less, say, the script for the television series "24".
This is not a call to go to war. But no warning before it.
Sunday, December 5, 2010
Gameshark Gba Pokemon Light Platinum
Abstract for presentation: eletrotechnics campaigns 2 (citizens)
Benedict Hielscher, Ole Tietjen, Lidiia Shymshyrt
As an example of civic initiative on the Internet, particularly the protest has access to the aggravation law. Since the initiative for this bill, which is seen by critics as advancement of censorship opportunities in the internet, mainly from the then Minister for Family Affairs Ursula emanated von der Leyen, the protest based on a play on censorship and Ursula, as Zensursula campaign known.
provides the starting point of the initiative, the online petition "No indexing and blocking of Internet sites" by Frank Heine, the well is 134 000 signatories to one of the most successful online petitions in general. The great social and political resonance This petition was brought about through the legislative process for Erschwerungdes access to child pornography on the Internet, has met with wide opposition.
order to explain the law and access difficulty to form the same basis for discussion, were presented the following issues in more detail:
objective
websites that child pornography should have, on the part of the Internet providers are locked out. A criminal consequence of calling such sites should not be the case.
implementation
The BKA created block lists that are updated daily and notify the Internet access provider or invite them to delete on this website, these should be your own provider on the servers. The block lists are checked by an expert panel. Provider DNS locks after 6 hours to implement. The BKA is submitted to an anonymous access statistics and provide, within 2 years, the federal government the progress of the project, the Bundestag.
Historical background
2001 - calls for the district government Dusseldorf a uniform federal control over the Internet
2002 - called on Internet service provider websites NRW with extremist content on Locking
2005 - confirmation by the High Administrative Court, but at the same time understanding that the containment measures were insufficient.
2009 - make announcement of the project by Ursula von der Leyen, filter child pornography to do
Legislator
On 22 April 2009, approved a draft law in the federal cabinet by
introduction and suspension
02/17/2010 Federal President Horst Köhler signed the law comes after some initial hesitation
02.23.2010-The law in Force
The BKA was, however, already at 22.02. instructed the law for the time being not to apply.
experience in other countries
countries with such locks: Italy, Finland, Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Netherlands, Great Britain, Switzerland, New Zealand, South Korea, Canada, Taiwan, (USA).
e-petition
Frank Heine of Berlin on 22 April 2009, the online petition started with the title "No indexing and blocking of Internet sites" against proposed law to block child porn on the internet. Sources of the petition was a discussion at Twitter. "Everyone was saying it's bad what happened to the law, but no one has done anything against it," says Heine. After discussion, they have started the petition. The
Hauptpetentin pleaded in the petition text clear to the fight against the abuse of children and found the blocking of websites as an inappropriate means in the fight against child pornography.
with 134 014 signatures to the petition was signed by most online petition in German history.
Zensursula campaign
an Internet protest action to limit the previous attempt to Internet freedom, with the aim of the presidential election to influence.
positioning of the parties
counter access block:
FDP
GREEN
The Left
(SPD) *
Pro Access block:
CDU / CSU
(SPD) decided *
* During the election campaign, the SPD order, although they allowed by their agreement the law.
Sources:
www.morgenpost.de https: / / epetitionen.bundestag.de
www.computerwoche.de
http://www.ak-zensur.de
http://www.zensursula.net /
www.netzpolitik.org
www.heise.de 
Benedict Hielscher, Ole Tietjen, Lidiia Shymshyrt
As an example of civic initiative on the Internet, particularly the protest has access to the aggravation law. Since the initiative for this bill, which is seen by critics as advancement of censorship opportunities in the internet, mainly from the then Minister for Family Affairs Ursula emanated von der Leyen, the protest based on a play on censorship and Ursula, as Zensursula campaign known.
provides the starting point of the initiative, the online petition "No indexing and blocking of Internet sites" by Frank Heine, the well is 134 000 signatories to one of the most successful online petitions in general. The great social and political resonance This petition was brought about through the legislative process for Erschwerungdes access to child pornography on the Internet, has met with wide opposition.
order to explain the law and access difficulty to form the same basis for discussion, were presented the following issues in more detail:
objective
websites that child pornography should have, on the part of the Internet providers are locked out. A criminal consequence of calling such sites should not be the case.
implementation
The BKA created block lists that are updated daily and notify the Internet access provider or invite them to delete on this website, these should be your own provider on the servers. The block lists are checked by an expert panel. Provider DNS locks after 6 hours to implement. The BKA is submitted to an anonymous access statistics and provide, within 2 years, the federal government the progress of the project, the Bundestag.
Historical background
2001 - calls for the district government Dusseldorf a uniform federal control over the Internet
2002 - called on Internet service provider websites NRW with extremist content on Locking
2005 - confirmation by the High Administrative Court, but at the same time understanding that the containment measures were insufficient.
2009 - make announcement of the project by Ursula von der Leyen, filter child pornography to do
Legislator
On 22 April 2009, approved a draft law in the federal cabinet by
introduction and suspension
02/17/2010 Federal President Horst Köhler signed the law comes after some initial hesitation
02.23.2010-The law in Force
The BKA was, however, already at 22.02. instructed the law for the time being not to apply.
experience in other countries
countries with such locks: Italy, Finland, Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Netherlands, Great Britain, Switzerland, New Zealand, South Korea, Canada, Taiwan, (USA).
e-petition
Frank Heine of Berlin on 22 April 2009, the online petition started with the title "No indexing and blocking of Internet sites" against proposed law to block child porn on the internet. Sources of the petition was a discussion at Twitter. "Everyone was saying it's bad what happened to the law, but no one has done anything against it," says Heine. After discussion, they have started the petition. The
Hauptpetentin pleaded in the petition text clear to the fight against the abuse of children and found the blocking of websites as an inappropriate means in the fight against child pornography.
with 134 014 signatures to the petition was signed by most online petition in German history.
Zensursula campaign
an Internet protest action to limit the previous attempt to Internet freedom, with the aim of the presidential election to influence.
positioning of the parties
counter access block:
FDP
GREEN
The Left
(SPD) *
Pro Access block:
CDU / CSU
(SPD) decided *
* During the election campaign, the SPD order, although they allowed by their agreement the law.
Sources:
www.morgenpost.de https: / / epetitionen.bundestag.de
www.computerwoche.de
http://www.ak-zensur.de
http://www.zensursula.net /
www.netzpolitik.org
www.heise.de
Friday, December 3, 2010
Honeywell Q674l Honeywell Old Thermostat
summary of the seminar paper: Transparency II
Abgeordnetenwatch.de - Because transparency creates trust
Under the motto "citizen questions - answer politician" was created in 2004 in the wake of the referendum on a new electoral law for the Hamburg abgeordnetenwatch.de first volunteer initiative. The aim was to overcome with the aid of a conversational interface attributes the gap between voters and elected representatives. All 121 deputies citizenship were listed with the most important information on their person, a photo and a contact address.
wake of its success, the platform 2006 to the Bundestag and 2008 extended to the European Parliament. Even local politicians from the district meetings in seven districts may be asked online. In addition to the vote and information about the outside activities and income of members of parliament can be done in abgeordnetenwatch.de one thing: ask questions. It is
abgeordnetenwatch.de a registered non-partisan association and institutionally independent. The public dialogue is to promote and ensure that political decisions are made transparent. Politicians should be closer to the citizens and their problems and needs. Virtually abgeordnetenwatch.de
works as follows: Each member has or Candidates a profile page. The questioner is his name and his e-mail address and asks its question. A team of presenters examined the question using a moderation of conduct drawn up by the Trustees, and unlock it. The questions and answers are then publicly for all to see. The questions will be forwarded directly to the deputies.
The Board of Trustees, which consists of eleven members include the moment in Dr. Jürgen Kühling, twelve years Judge of the Federal Constitutional Court, Prof. Dr. Hans J. Kleinsteuber, a professor of political science and journalism at the University of Hamburg, and Dr. Manfred Brandt, member of the Hamburg State Board of More Democracy to. The Board of Trustees established Moderation Code prohibits in particular the activation of contributions, in which racist, sexist, abusive, inhumane or private questions.
The platform uses a mixed funding. First, it draws its funds from donations and funding contributions from Parlamentwatch.de, own support groups, online advertising and a project cost-sharing of candidates. The non-profit partner Bonventure GmbH provides the necessary risk capital.
Who responds and how to respond?
Looking at the response of various Members are clear differences visible. Where a Be very detailed and comprehensive answers and hide behind other Members to delegate them to standard formulations or colleagues asked questions. In the "signature" they are different: in some cases, the name used is the deputies, in another sign the "team". In general, one can assume that the members write their answers themselves. The Federal Chancellor Angela Merkel
not used at all abgeordnetenwatch.de. It has its own platform - direktzurkanzlerin.de.
Direkzu
The direktzu GmbH was founded in late 2006 by students at the FU Berlin. Meanwhile, there is a 20-member Team behind this company. It is supported financially by the European Union, the Free University of Berlin and the Brandenburg University. It is unclear how much money the company occupies itself and demands for their services. On the home page of the website will be asked to ask about the 'special pricing options for policy makers and civil society. " According to information provided direktzu
is a "provider of software-based solutions that provide by modern many-to-one communications for efficiency and relevance in direct exchange between large groups and exposed addressees. There are two types of communication software: direktzu corporate (direktzu Intern), which is designed for companies and should make for more efficient communication between employees and management, and direktzu politics (direktzu external) which aims at a better citizen and crisis communications, and customer feedback platforms.
Direktzu politics is mostly used by individual politicians. So far, the Angela Merkel, Ilse Aigner, Dirk Niebel, Matthias Platzeck, Wolfgang Böhmer, Holger Rupprecht, Harald Wolf, Markus Lewe, Jürgen Nimptsch and Christian Ude. The presence of Norbert Lammert and Horst Seehofer was adjusted because of "low demand" or "at the request of the Bavarian State Chancellery, for strategic reasons."
Since 22.9.2010 there is also the project page dirketzustuttgart21.de "there is communication on what not to individual politicians, but with the project partners. This is an example of crisis communication.
direktzu The softwares are also in English (straightto) and was used in the last election campaign in the USA.
The press has largely taken a positive stance on direktzu. So many terms like "Internet democracy", "digital populism" or "promotion of social communication." However, there is the accusation that it was at the side only a "complaints mailbox", but this does nothing.
Dirketzurkanzlerin.de
This site was founded in October 2006. It is very simple. Asker can register and post a message as text, with audio or video. Voting on the contributions and rated three are sent once a week to respond to the Government Press Office. The answers are (especially compared to some examples on abgeordnetenwatch.de) in some detail and will specifically address the issue. The questions and answers to the public and can be filtered by various criteria.
Direktzurkanzlerin.de has been relatively successful and had been in the first week 30,000 visits.
A look to the UK: mysociety.org
Mysociety.org is an example of various e-democracy projects there since 2003. On the homepage of many of their own projects will be seeking for all citizens to improve and simplify everyday life.
examples include the home pages They Work For You, which provides information on members, and Fix My Street, on the citizens pictures of broken roads, etc. can upload lanterns which are then forwarded to local officials.
Write to Them
Write to Them follows a very simple Principle: The citizens can enter their zip code and then see which representative represents. You can write a message that is forwarded to them. Thus, a personal contact between citizens and representative can be produced. The questions and answers are not published.
Hear From Your MP
In Hear From Your MP to the citizens by name, e-mail login address and ZIP code. If enough people register in his constituency, the MP receives a message informing you how many people are interested in his work. Can the MP to one, everyone gets notified Citizens of a newsletter by the MP to the current issues. Directly in this newsletter there is a link, so that citizens can respond. It is built up a kind of blog-on principle: the MP writes a statement, the subscriber can comment on it and it may give a call. This offer is used by nearly 137 000 British.
The problem with this is that many MPs do not participate. Many of them prefer soft on e-mails and Twitter services.
Abgeordnetenwatch.de, and direktzurkanzlerin Write to Them - A brief comparison
It has become clear that all three offers a better and easier communication between citizens and politicians want to establish. The former should participate more and get the latter a better look of what the people really interested. However, there are some differences:
Abgeordnetenwatch.de sees itself as a platform of "collective memory of voters." Where a question to the moderation of conduct, it is forwarded directly to the deputies. All question and (non) answers will be published. In
direktzurkanzlerin it looks different. There are only three issues a week forwarded to the Federal Press Office. These three questions are then the ones of interest to the majority of users. Issues with smaller concerns are therefore not to direktzurkanzlerin answered.
Write to Them follows a completely different principle than the other two platforms: This is not the goal, a large database of questions and answers to build, but the questions are not published. Write to Them acts more as a mediator between citizen and representative, by producing a personal e-mail. 
Jaime Galvis, John Güssefeld, Charlotte Carnehl, Lilian Krause, Marie-Christine Hoehne
Under the motto "citizen questions - answer politician" was created in 2004 in the wake of the referendum on a new electoral law for the Hamburg abgeordnetenwatch.de first volunteer initiative. The aim was to overcome with the aid of a conversational interface attributes the gap between voters and elected representatives. All 121 deputies citizenship were listed with the most important information on their person, a photo and a contact address.
wake of its success, the platform 2006 to the Bundestag and 2008 extended to the European Parliament. Even local politicians from the district meetings in seven districts may be asked online. In addition to the vote and information about the outside activities and income of members of parliament can be done in abgeordnetenwatch.de one thing: ask questions. It is
abgeordnetenwatch.de a registered non-partisan association and institutionally independent. The public dialogue is to promote and ensure that political decisions are made transparent. Politicians should be closer to the citizens and their problems and needs. Virtually abgeordnetenwatch.de
works as follows: Each member has or Candidates a profile page. The questioner is his name and his e-mail address and asks its question. A team of presenters examined the question using a moderation of conduct drawn up by the Trustees, and unlock it. The questions and answers are then publicly for all to see. The questions will be forwarded directly to the deputies.
The Board of Trustees, which consists of eleven members include the moment in Dr. Jürgen Kühling, twelve years Judge of the Federal Constitutional Court, Prof. Dr. Hans J. Kleinsteuber, a professor of political science and journalism at the University of Hamburg, and Dr. Manfred Brandt, member of the Hamburg State Board of More Democracy to. The Board of Trustees established Moderation Code prohibits in particular the activation of contributions, in which racist, sexist, abusive, inhumane or private questions.
The platform uses a mixed funding. First, it draws its funds from donations and funding contributions from Parlamentwatch.de, own support groups, online advertising and a project cost-sharing of candidates. The non-profit partner Bonventure GmbH provides the necessary risk capital.
Who responds and how to respond?
Looking at the response of various Members are clear differences visible. Where a Be very detailed and comprehensive answers and hide behind other Members to delegate them to standard formulations or colleagues asked questions. In the "signature" they are different: in some cases, the name used is the deputies, in another sign the "team". In general, one can assume that the members write their answers themselves. The Federal Chancellor Angela Merkel
not used at all abgeordnetenwatch.de. It has its own platform - direktzurkanzlerin.de.
Direkzu
The direktzu GmbH was founded in late 2006 by students at the FU Berlin. Meanwhile, there is a 20-member Team behind this company. It is supported financially by the European Union, the Free University of Berlin and the Brandenburg University. It is unclear how much money the company occupies itself and demands for their services. On the home page of the website will be asked to ask about the 'special pricing options for policy makers and civil society. " According to information provided direktzu
is a "provider of software-based solutions that provide by modern many-to-one communications for efficiency and relevance in direct exchange between large groups and exposed addressees. There are two types of communication software: direktzu corporate (direktzu Intern), which is designed for companies and should make for more efficient communication between employees and management, and direktzu politics (direktzu external) which aims at a better citizen and crisis communications, and customer feedback platforms.
Direktzu politics is mostly used by individual politicians. So far, the Angela Merkel, Ilse Aigner, Dirk Niebel, Matthias Platzeck, Wolfgang Böhmer, Holger Rupprecht, Harald Wolf, Markus Lewe, Jürgen Nimptsch and Christian Ude. The presence of Norbert Lammert and Horst Seehofer was adjusted because of "low demand" or "at the request of the Bavarian State Chancellery, for strategic reasons."
Since 22.9.2010 there is also the project page dirketzustuttgart21.de "there is communication on what not to individual politicians, but with the project partners. This is an example of crisis communication.
direktzu The softwares are also in English (straightto) and was used in the last election campaign in the USA.
The press has largely taken a positive stance on direktzu. So many terms like "Internet democracy", "digital populism" or "promotion of social communication." However, there is the accusation that it was at the side only a "complaints mailbox", but this does nothing.
Dirketzurkanzlerin.de
This site was founded in October 2006. It is very simple. Asker can register and post a message as text, with audio or video. Voting on the contributions and rated three are sent once a week to respond to the Government Press Office. The answers are (especially compared to some examples on abgeordnetenwatch.de) in some detail and will specifically address the issue. The questions and answers to the public and can be filtered by various criteria.
Direktzurkanzlerin.de has been relatively successful and had been in the first week 30,000 visits.
A look to the UK: mysociety.org
Mysociety.org is an example of various e-democracy projects there since 2003. On the homepage of many of their own projects will be seeking for all citizens to improve and simplify everyday life.
examples include the home pages They Work For You, which provides information on members, and Fix My Street, on the citizens pictures of broken roads, etc. can upload lanterns which are then forwarded to local officials.
Write to Them
Write to Them follows a very simple Principle: The citizens can enter their zip code and then see which representative represents. You can write a message that is forwarded to them. Thus, a personal contact between citizens and representative can be produced. The questions and answers are not published.
Hear From Your MP
In Hear From Your MP to the citizens by name, e-mail login address and ZIP code. If enough people register in his constituency, the MP receives a message informing you how many people are interested in his work. Can the MP to one, everyone gets notified Citizens of a newsletter by the MP to the current issues. Directly in this newsletter there is a link, so that citizens can respond. It is built up a kind of blog-on principle: the MP writes a statement, the subscriber can comment on it and it may give a call. This offer is used by nearly 137 000 British.
The problem with this is that many MPs do not participate. Many of them prefer soft on e-mails and Twitter services.
Abgeordnetenwatch.de, and direktzurkanzlerin Write to Them - A brief comparison
It has become clear that all three offers a better and easier communication between citizens and politicians want to establish. The former should participate more and get the latter a better look of what the people really interested. However, there are some differences:
Abgeordnetenwatch.de sees itself as a platform of "collective memory of voters." Where a question to the moderation of conduct, it is forwarded directly to the deputies. All question and (non) answers will be published. In
direktzurkanzlerin it looks different. There are only three issues a week forwarded to the Federal Press Office. These three questions are then the ones of interest to the majority of users. Issues with smaller concerns are therefore not to direktzurkanzlerin answered.
Write to Them follows a completely different principle than the other two platforms: This is not the goal, a large database of questions and answers to build, but the questions are not published. Write to Them acts more as a mediator between citizen and representative, by producing a personal e-mail.
Wednesday, December 1, 2010
Decoration Of Wedding Bed
December 1, 2010 ...
... Today, Wednesday, I opened the first door of my advent. And I had the time and thought to myself, but sometimes I look into my "old" blog. Indulge in memories, in my own depth reports, read comments and I smiled. The
, this month in Ireland, were something special, unique. And she became a part of it. Out of the question away.
I wish you a wonderful Christmas season.
Love, Lisa
... Today, Wednesday, I opened the first door of my advent. And I had the time and thought to myself, but sometimes I look into my "old" blog. Indulge in memories, in my own depth reports, read comments and I smiled. The
, this month in Ireland, were something special, unique. And she became a part of it. Out of the question away.
I wish you a wonderful Christmas season.
Love, Lisa
Friday, November 19, 2010
Garnierblack Licorice
Abstract for presentation: eletrotechnics campaigns 1 (parties and candidates)
by Sidonie Fernau, Aviles Luna Luz Marina, Jatinder Singh Matharu, Natalie Kontny
construction
The speech the foundations for an electronic election campaign were described. They presented two campaigns in two different countries: In Germany, the Shepherd Gumbel campaign and in the U.S., the Barack Obama campaign. In the end, a comparison was drawn and discussed whether and if so to what extent contribute online campaigns in Germany for the election results.
Germany
Internet users in Germany
In Germany, the number of Internet users in recent years has increased very significantly. In 2009 about 49 million people used the Internet (According to the ARD / ZDF Online Study 2010). Based on this user group to develop campaign manager finally potential target groups of the online campaign and provide guidance on strategic positioning options.
target audience of the campaign
target group of the online campaign was multipliers, campaign workers and eligible voters. The aim of the online campaign was the most convincing, Encourage, mobilize and lead to a positive vote.
Internet application
The politicians use the Internet for the campaign into different directions. E-mail newsletters, Web sites of candidates, blogs, online communities, videos, games and animation, web forums and web chats: Important applications for online campaigns in Germany.
organization of the campaign
The organization of the online campaign was carried out by an advertising agency (www.barracuda.de).
USA
Internet users in the U.S.
It was shown that the Internet as an information platform for the U.S. election campaign is gaining in importance. In particular, young Americans 18 to 29 use the Internet to get information.
target groups in the campaign
The target audience of the campaign consisted of donors, voters, campaign workers and multipliers.
funding played an important role in the campaign. Barack Obama has received a total of about 745 million U.S. dollars in donations. In particular, small and micro-donations played an important role.
Internet applications
e-mails, newsletters, SMS, phone calls, videos, social media, etc. played an important role. Obama had his own television crew, mobilized millions of people, the little things organized and networked online. Centerpiece of his campaign was his site that made possible the networking and better organization. Here, there were also phone guides, telephone and mailing lists and a calendar to plan better for the events. Also there was the possibility to donate online.
organization of the campaign
Barack Obama has had his own campaign team. The Internet campaign has been Barack Obama's main campaign tool.
The comparison
The donations in the U.S. is higher in comparison with Germany. In U.S. there are many private donors who support their party or candidates.
play in Germany, the parties play a more important role, as in the U.S. are two big parties that differ in content very much a voter is usually with his party. In the U.S., elections are to more personalized.
In the U.S. the Internet is from ordinary people but also by politicians campaigning tapped. Since Barack Obama's campaign is also in Germany, the Internet more miteingebunden in the campaign.
sources
Obama
http://www.linkedin.com/in/barackobama
http://twitter.com/BARACKOBAMA
http://www.facebook.com/barackobama
http:/ / www.flickr.com / photos / barack obama dotcom
http://www.myspace.com/barackobama
http://my.barackobama.com/page/user/login?successurl=L3BhZ2UvZGFzaGJvYXJkL3ByaXZhdGU = &
_h = R7eLleNlvR32IUbri4ek40kHrFI
http://www.youtube.com/barackobama
Shepherd Gümbel.
http://www.schaefer-guembel.de/html/-1/welcome/index.html
http://www.welt.de/videos/politik/inland/article3019116/Schaefer-Guembel-steht-auf-allen-
Seiten.html # AutoPlay
General:
Emmer, Martin; Vowe, Gerhard (2004): mobilization through the Internet? Results of a longitudinal study empirical
the influence of the Internet on political communication
of citizens. Political Quarterly. Journal of the German Association of Political Science
.
Merz, Manuel; Rhein, Stefan, Vetter, Julia: Campaign on the Internet; handbook for policy
online campaign. Public affairs and policy management, Münster 2006
http://www.seo-strategie.de/blog/internet-wahlkampf/179.html 
by Sidonie Fernau, Aviles Luna Luz Marina, Jatinder Singh Matharu, Natalie Kontny
construction
The speech the foundations for an electronic election campaign were described. They presented two campaigns in two different countries: In Germany, the Shepherd Gumbel campaign and in the U.S., the Barack Obama campaign. In the end, a comparison was drawn and discussed whether and if so to what extent contribute online campaigns in Germany for the election results.
Germany
Internet users in Germany
In Germany, the number of Internet users in recent years has increased very significantly. In 2009 about 49 million people used the Internet (According to the ARD / ZDF Online Study 2010). Based on this user group to develop campaign manager finally potential target groups of the online campaign and provide guidance on strategic positioning options.
target audience of the campaign
target group of the online campaign was multipliers, campaign workers and eligible voters. The aim of the online campaign was the most convincing, Encourage, mobilize and lead to a positive vote.
Internet application
The politicians use the Internet for the campaign into different directions. E-mail newsletters, Web sites of candidates, blogs, online communities, videos, games and animation, web forums and web chats: Important applications for online campaigns in Germany.
organization of the campaign
The organization of the online campaign was carried out by an advertising agency (www.barracuda.de).
USA
Internet users in the U.S.
It was shown that the Internet as an information platform for the U.S. election campaign is gaining in importance. In particular, young Americans 18 to 29 use the Internet to get information.
target groups in the campaign
The target audience of the campaign consisted of donors, voters, campaign workers and multipliers.
funding played an important role in the campaign. Barack Obama has received a total of about 745 million U.S. dollars in donations. In particular, small and micro-donations played an important role.
Internet applications
e-mails, newsletters, SMS, phone calls, videos, social media, etc. played an important role. Obama had his own television crew, mobilized millions of people, the little things organized and networked online. Centerpiece of his campaign was his site that made possible the networking and better organization. Here, there were also phone guides, telephone and mailing lists and a calendar to plan better for the events. Also there was the possibility to donate online.
- campaign on par
- self-controlled information
organization of the campaign
Barack Obama has had his own campaign team. The Internet campaign has been Barack Obama's main campaign tool.
The comparison
The donations in the U.S. is higher in comparison with Germany. In U.S. there are many private donors who support their party or candidates.
play in Germany, the parties play a more important role, as in the U.S. are two big parties that differ in content very much a voter is usually with his party. In the U.S., elections are to more personalized.
In the U.S. the Internet is from ordinary people but also by politicians campaigning tapped. Since Barack Obama's campaign is also in Germany, the Internet more miteingebunden in the campaign.
sources
Obama
http://www.linkedin.com/in/barackobama
http://twitter.com/BARACKOBAMA
http://www.facebook.com/barackobama
http:/ / www.flickr.com / photos / barack obama dotcom
http://www.myspace.com/barackobama
http://my.barackobama.com/page/user/login?successurl=L3BhZ2UvZGFzaGJvYXJkL3ByaXZhdGU = &
_h = R7eLleNlvR32IUbri4ek40kHrFI
http://www.youtube.com/barackobama
Shepherd Gümbel.
http://www.schaefer-guembel.de/html/-1/welcome/index.html
http://www.welt.de/videos/politik/inland/article3019116/Schaefer-Guembel-steht-auf-allen-
Seiten.html # AutoPlay
General:
Emmer, Martin; Vowe, Gerhard (2004): mobilization through the Internet? Results of a longitudinal study empirical
the influence of the Internet on political communication
of citizens. Political Quarterly. Journal of the German Association of Political Science
.
Merz, Manuel; Rhein, Stefan, Vetter, Julia: Campaign on the Internet; handbook for policy
online campaign. Public affairs and policy management, Münster 2006
http://www.seo-strategie.de/blog/internet-wahlkampf/179.html
Wednesday, November 17, 2010
Funny Things To Write On Cards
Scroogle - Anonymous look! Consumer
who has no desire to leave every time you search a data track and puts value on privacy should use Scroogle. Here the Link: www.scroogle.org 
who has no desire to leave every time you search a data track and puts value on privacy should use Scroogle. Here the Link: www.scroogle.org
Wednesday, November 10, 2010
Hpv Skin Tags On Neck
I just noticed that Milan put all images from our Bastard Space Show which we did together in Munich 2008 online on his website. Thanks! We basically merged some of our works, which made a pretty cool jam! Exhibition at the Praterinsel in München / Germany. March 2008.120qm of visual art. 5 banner sized pillared collages. (5 x 2,1m x 11m). Check out for more details here: www.spamconsumer.com
Monday, November 1, 2010
Newfoundland Crosssaint Bernard
Summary of Presentation: Overview: Global Agora or "just another medium“?
By Stefan Horn, Daniel Wietstock, Martin Pioch
Below are the promises that the Internet connected as a means / vehicle of the policy since the 70s, and the change in the discussion about the reality of the Internet in relation to policy are presented. For this, the development of the Internet is divided into three phases. The first phase starts about 1970 and ends at the beginning of the 1990s and dedicated to the early days of the Internet and the role of television. The second phase starts from 1990 until around 2001, and provides important political concepts and the development of the "New Economy "before. From that date, including the final phase to the current present in which it is primarily for social networking, Web 2.0 is and political legitimacy problems.
The beginnings of the development to 1990:
The term "Internet" was originally a communications network of military and scientific research linked. The military use of split off in 1983. As a principle, open network it replaced the TV as a central medium from growing. As a result, the Internet grew exponentially. It was 1996, approximately 10,000 Internet pages, 2000, the number of Web pages to two million and are now about 97 million websites worldwide online.
1990-2001: From the "information highway" to the "New Economy"
In the 1990's, several new concepts, such as the term "information superhighway" by Al Gore in the USA in 1993, in Germany according to the term "information superhighway". The Internet was in the episode as the third wave of development, the so-called "Knowledge Age", considered. Gained political importance of the concepts of "cyber democracy" and "deliberation": Internet intended as a "democratic marketplace" according to Athens, as a separate political space communications could take place by the citizens to the political system and the citizens themselves. The "deliberation" as a development of "cyber democracy" could also have the argumentative discussion, the discussion on property level and moderated chat rooms as an important basis (example: "Publikom" the city of Munster).
followed later in the concept of "e-Democracy", which saw the citizens as "customers" of the political system and the political actor as a service.
From the 90 final Years were IT companies as the industry of the future, so that this area was the term used "New Economy". At first he was linked with high hopes on financial wealth, especially through stock trading, later connected to the bursting of the dot-com bubble "with both the rise and the fall of many IT companies.
2000 to present: "Web 2.0", "E-governance and political interests became increasingly
With the turn of 2000/2001 easy for anyone to-use forms of communication, such as chats and blogs on. As a result, were "social networks" with increasingly global scale. The concept of "Web 2.0" was a synonym for many-to-many communication. At the political level was the concept of e-governance, are involved in the discussions by citizens in political decisions at local level. An example is the platform "DEMOS" in Hamburg.
Conclusion:
As before, but the Internet transmission of old patterns characterized, there is no specific Internet Media dispositive "because much of the potential could not be realized. In particular are the representativeness and untapped user communities and the total of existing politics is a problem dar. So it is apparently still in an "experimental phase".
Sources:
Bauer, Werner (2003): Internet and democracy - a democratic process of the network?. Vienna: Austrian Society for policy advice and development.
Grunwald, Armin; Banse, Gerhard; Hennen, Leonhard (2006): Net population and digital democracy - trends of political communication on the Internet. Berlin: Edition sigma.
Welz, Hans-Georg (2002): From Politics and Contemporary History - Political Communication and Internet communications. Bonn: Federal Agency for Civic Education.
By Stefan Horn, Daniel Wietstock, Martin Pioch
Below are the promises that the Internet connected as a means / vehicle of the policy since the 70s, and the change in the discussion about the reality of the Internet in relation to policy are presented. For this, the development of the Internet is divided into three phases. The first phase starts about 1970 and ends at the beginning of the 1990s and dedicated to the early days of the Internet and the role of television. The second phase starts from 1990 until around 2001, and provides important political concepts and the development of the "New Economy "before. From that date, including the final phase to the current present in which it is primarily for social networking, Web 2.0 is and political legitimacy problems.
The beginnings of the development to 1990:
The term "Internet" was originally a communications network of military and scientific research linked. The military use of split off in 1983. As a principle, open network it replaced the TV as a central medium from growing. As a result, the Internet grew exponentially. It was 1996, approximately 10,000 Internet pages, 2000, the number of Web pages to two million and are now about 97 million websites worldwide online.
1990-2001: From the "information highway" to the "New Economy"
In the 1990's, several new concepts, such as the term "information superhighway" by Al Gore in the USA in 1993, in Germany according to the term "information superhighway". The Internet was in the episode as the third wave of development, the so-called "Knowledge Age", considered. Gained political importance of the concepts of "cyber democracy" and "deliberation": Internet intended as a "democratic marketplace" according to Athens, as a separate political space communications could take place by the citizens to the political system and the citizens themselves. The "deliberation" as a development of "cyber democracy" could also have the argumentative discussion, the discussion on property level and moderated chat rooms as an important basis (example: "Publikom" the city of Munster).
followed later in the concept of "e-Democracy", which saw the citizens as "customers" of the political system and the political actor as a service.
From the 90 final Years were IT companies as the industry of the future, so that this area was the term used "New Economy". At first he was linked with high hopes on financial wealth, especially through stock trading, later connected to the bursting of the dot-com bubble "with both the rise and the fall of many IT companies.
2000 to present: "Web 2.0", "E-governance and political interests became increasingly
With the turn of 2000/2001 easy for anyone to-use forms of communication, such as chats and blogs on. As a result, were "social networks" with increasingly global scale. The concept of "Web 2.0" was a synonym for many-to-many communication. At the political level was the concept of e-governance, are involved in the discussions by citizens in political decisions at local level. An example is the platform "DEMOS" in Hamburg.
Conclusion:
As before, but the Internet transmission of old patterns characterized, there is no specific Internet Media dispositive "because much of the potential could not be realized. In particular are the representativeness and untapped user communities and the total of existing politics is a problem dar. So it is apparently still in an "experimental phase".
Sources:
Bauer, Werner (2003): Internet and democracy - a democratic process of the network?. Vienna: Austrian Society for policy advice and development.
Grunwald, Armin; Banse, Gerhard; Hennen, Leonhard (2006): Net population and digital democracy - trends of political communication on the Internet. Berlin: Edition sigma.
Welz, Hans-Georg (2002): From Politics and Contemporary History - Political Communication and Internet communications. Bonn: Federal Agency for Civic Education.
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
Why Is My Period Blood Mucus
spam "Submitted" or "posted"? Virtual
Im Gutachten "Modernisierung des Datenschutzrechts" im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums des Innern, verfasst im Jahr 2001 von Alexander Rossnagel, Andreas Pfitzmann and Hans Jürgen Garstka were first made comprehensive proposals for adapting the law to the new realities of electronic networking, which can be described by the terms globality, virtuality, convergence and transparency. The proposals were but weiterverfolgt.Nun not for many years are proposals from the Independent Centre for Privacy Protection Schleswig-Holstein (ULD) for the regulation of personal Internet data releases from:
law on the regulation of Internet publications in the Federal Data Protection Act (as of 10/27/2010)
https: / / www.datenschutzzentrum.de/internet/20101027-gesetzentwurf-internetveroeffentlichungen.html
The draft formulated the main guidelines for a specific specification, such as a regulated self-regulation can be observed and substantiated and need. In this respect, he takes up the key points of the Federal Ministry of the Interior during the peak call "Digitalization of urban and rural areas" of 20.09.2010 on.
I reach out this time only two changes, but I recommend the text read at the link above.
Ad 2 Amendment to § 3 para 1 (Relevant data)
The increased collection of factual data to which a personal reference can be made, for example via the Internet of things "(such as smart phones, intelligent household") or through the acquisition of property (for example, automobiles, houses, properties) as the content data of Internet publications, is an uncertainty in the determination of people to mere factual data formed. The Art 29 Data Protection Working Party of the European Union has this worked out an opinion that is not the be placed on the theoretical Personenbeziehbarkeit a material date, but whether the subject date is in a context of a natural person or may be made functionally and thus there is a moral rights meaningful. The Article 29 Working Party established the first results from the context, 2 or 3 contents context context purpose (Art. 29 Data Protection Working Party, Opinion 4 / 2007 by 20.06.2007, WP 136). The text of the law is that reasoning by law.
Ad 3 Further to § 3 para 4 (Term of publishing)
Until now subsumed the provision of personal data to an unlimited number of recipients within the definition of "transmit" (Federal Constitutional Court NJW 1988, 2031, and further evidence for Weichert Däubler / Adhesive / Weddington / Weichert, BDSG, 3rd ed § 3 footnote 46). The application of this transmission concept has meant that the practice of publishing personal data in electronic networks, particularly the Internet, practically a plurality of transmission schemes no longer apply, you do not want to exclude this publication legally complete. This is especially true for the Establishment of automated retrieval procedure (§ 10) and the basic rules of § 29 paragraph 2 to the data processing for the purpose of transfer. The Supreme Court took in reliance on article 5 of the Basic Law in its Spickmich rating this conclusion and reasoned from basic legal considerations, the practical inapplicability of § 29 paragraph 2 in the practically most relevant range of expression on the Internet (BGH NJW 2009, 2888 - Spickmich). This inapplicability is ultimately the transmission rules into question. The introduction of the concept of publishing This form of data processing is now subject to a separate regime and conceptually from the "Submit" separately. The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has solved the problem of practical unenforceability of the transfer rules in that it in Internet publications, the applications of the term transfer denied, but without deriving a self-control (ECJ RDV 2004, 16). With the creation of the new § 29a this gap is filled. 
Im Gutachten "Modernisierung des Datenschutzrechts" im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums des Innern, verfasst im Jahr 2001 von Alexander Rossnagel, Andreas Pfitzmann and Hans Jürgen Garstka were first made comprehensive proposals for adapting the law to the new realities of electronic networking, which can be described by the terms globality, virtuality, convergence and transparency. The proposals were but weiterverfolgt.Nun not for many years are proposals from the Independent Centre for Privacy Protection Schleswig-Holstein (ULD) for the regulation of personal Internet data releases from:
law on the regulation of Internet publications in the Federal Data Protection Act (as of 10/27/2010)
https: / / www.datenschutzzentrum.de/internet/20101027-gesetzentwurf-internetveroeffentlichungen.html
The draft formulated the main guidelines for a specific specification, such as a regulated self-regulation can be observed and substantiated and need. In this respect, he takes up the key points of the Federal Ministry of the Interior during the peak call "Digitalization of urban and rural areas" of 20.09.2010 on.
I reach out this time only two changes, but I recommend the text read at the link above.
Ad 2 Amendment to § 3 para 1 (Relevant data)
The increased collection of factual data to which a personal reference can be made, for example via the Internet of things "(such as smart phones, intelligent household") or through the acquisition of property (for example, automobiles, houses, properties) as the content data of Internet publications, is an uncertainty in the determination of people to mere factual data formed. The Art 29 Data Protection Working Party of the European Union has this worked out an opinion that is not the be placed on the theoretical Personenbeziehbarkeit a material date, but whether the subject date is in a context of a natural person or may be made functionally and thus there is a moral rights meaningful. The Article 29 Working Party established the first results from the context, 2 or 3 contents context context purpose (Art. 29 Data Protection Working Party, Opinion 4 / 2007 by 20.06.2007, WP 136). The text of the law is that reasoning by law.
Ad 3 Further to § 3 para 4 (Term of publishing)
Until now subsumed the provision of personal data to an unlimited number of recipients within the definition of "transmit" (Federal Constitutional Court NJW 1988, 2031, and further evidence for Weichert Däubler / Adhesive / Weddington / Weichert, BDSG, 3rd ed § 3 footnote 46). The application of this transmission concept has meant that the practice of publishing personal data in electronic networks, particularly the Internet, practically a plurality of transmission schemes no longer apply, you do not want to exclude this publication legally complete. This is especially true for the Establishment of automated retrieval procedure (§ 10) and the basic rules of § 29 paragraph 2 to the data processing for the purpose of transfer. The Supreme Court took in reliance on article 5 of the Basic Law in its Spickmich rating this conclusion and reasoned from basic legal considerations, the practical inapplicability of § 29 paragraph 2 in the practically most relevant range of expression on the Internet (BGH NJW 2009, 2888 - Spickmich). This inapplicability is ultimately the transmission rules into question. The introduction of the concept of publishing This form of data processing is now subject to a separate regime and conceptually from the "Submit" separately. The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has solved the problem of practical unenforceability of the transfer rules in that it in Internet publications, the applications of the term transfer denied, but without deriving a self-control (ECJ RDV 2004, 16). With the creation of the new § 29a this gap is filled.
Monday, October 25, 2010
Blisterskin Turning Black
air rights - Remember New Zurich Newspaper
Have just learned that my article entitled "The published room" now after publication in the Austrian Standard 22 9. has also appeared in the New Zurich Zeitung (on 5 Oct 2010). Given that active in the meantime, 3% of all households affected by the deletion in Germany in Google Street View have requested (deadline 15 Oct. 2010), there are no more excuses to act effectively at last! So -
Dear Mr. Thomas de Maizière: "PLEASE READ" 
Have just learned that my article entitled "The published room" now after publication in the Austrian Standard 22 9. has also appeared in the New Zurich Zeitung (on 5 Oct 2010). Given that active in the meantime, 3% of all households affected by the deletion in Germany in Google Street View have requested (deadline 15 Oct. 2010), there are no more excuses to act effectively at last! So -
Dear Mr. Thomas de Maizière: "PLEASE READ"
Sunday, October 24, 2010
Does Walgreens Mi Paste
The aural space
"Childhood is one in golden light bathed landscape. not for everyone. Not always. It is located in a country that moves with age into the distance, well protected by a thicket of memories. A return is impossible. Some stories just fade or lose their shape. But what always remains is a feeling, a mood that is reminiscent of Andrei Tarkovsky 'remark that the only thing you remember in a film, the light was.
The kindergarten in the Senft Straße in Munich receives a golden tent in which reflected the sun. The Court of kindergarten, which is predominantly inhabited by "children with migration background" is so immersed in golden light. In this golden light every interpretation is not important whether it is could act to the object and the tip of a submerged church or minaret. In this golden light, it is also every interpretation irrelevant whether this object is nomadic in now or not. In this light. In this golden light. "Stephan Doesinger
After considerable technical difficulties, the golden tent was finally completed. The official opening and handover will take place tomorrow on 26 October in the Senftenauerstr. 25 in Munich.
location: Senftenauerstr. 25 in Munich
Client: City of Munich
clothing and tent construction: textile construction Link
membrane lining: Darmstaedter
Note November 2010. The Tent is damaged due to a bad film Kaschierungder Darmstaedter by the company and must be renewed after a few days - but then .. with another company!
Goldbedampfung: RoWo Coating Link
Interior: Bänfer Link
A special thanks to the team of textile construction and especially to Mr.. Gühne.
thanks to Hr. Bow and Hr. Carbon from the construction department of the city of Munich,
and to the kindergarten management and last but not least, the children
for your patience.
May the light of this tent gladden the hearts of the children (and adults)! 
"Childhood is one in golden light bathed landscape. not for everyone. Not always. It is located in a country that moves with age into the distance, well protected by a thicket of memories. A return is impossible. Some stories just fade or lose their shape. But what always remains is a feeling, a mood that is reminiscent of Andrei Tarkovsky 'remark that the only thing you remember in a film, the light was.
The kindergarten in the Senft Straße in Munich receives a golden tent in which reflected the sun. The Court of kindergarten, which is predominantly inhabited by "children with migration background" is so immersed in golden light. In this golden light every interpretation is not important whether it is could act to the object and the tip of a submerged church or minaret. In this golden light, it is also every interpretation irrelevant whether this object is nomadic in now or not. In this light. In this golden light. "Stephan Doesinger
After considerable technical difficulties, the golden tent was finally completed. The official opening and handover will take place tomorrow on 26 October in the Senftenauerstr. 25 in Munich.
location: Senftenauerstr. 25 in Munich
Client: City of Munich
clothing and tent construction: textile construction Link
membrane lining: Darmstaedter
Note November 2010. The Tent is damaged due to a bad film Kaschierungder Darmstaedter by the company and must be renewed after a few days - but then .. with another company!
Goldbedampfung: RoWo Coating Link
Interior: Bänfer Link
A special thanks to the team of textile construction and especially to Mr.. Gühne.
thanks to Hr. Bow and Hr. Carbon from the construction department of the city of Munich,
and to the kindergarten management and last but not least, the children
for your patience.
May the light of this tent gladden the hearts of the children (and adults)!
Friday, October 1, 2010
Hot Spot For Gay Men In Nj
Lesetoff the Bronze Age
Munich / Wiesbaden (world-of-Bronze Age) - On "GRIN for academic texts" are numerous printed brochures and e-books in PDF format available from cultures from the Bronze Age. These are chapters from the book "Germany in the Bronze Age" in old German spelling. These titles can be purchased at "GRIN" at the address http://www.grin.com the web. They are also available at more than 1,000 online bookstores as well as in any good bookstore. Below Summaries of these books and e-books: The Eagle Mountain
culture
The Bronze Age is more than 2000-800 BC as the first and longer of the Metal Ages in Europe. During this time, tools, weapons and ornaments made of bronze were made. In some areas of the Bronze Age had a different time period. So they began in southern Germany before about 2300 BC and ended around 800 BC In northern Germany, however, it lasted from about 1600 to 500 BC The spread of the Bronze Age cultures in Germany is the eagle mountain culture. She was from about 2100 1800 BC, the Upper Rhine Valley in Rhineland-Palatinate (Rheinland, Pfalz), Hesse and parts of Baden-Wuerttemberg (North York) disseminated. It is certainly emerged from the Neolithic Beaker culture. put it bluntly, it is "is a" Beaker-Beaker culture without. For these two cultural phenomena were in regards to the burial customs, bow and arrow and her identical settlement very close. The text on the eagle mountain culture comes from the print book "Germany in the Bronze Age" (1996) Science of the Wiesbaden author Ernst Probst old German spelling and corresponds to the standard of knowledge. Other cultures of the Bronze Age from Germany will also be presented in separate publications.
orders: http://www.grin.com/e-book/114062/die-adlerberg-kultur
The Unetice culture
The Bronze Age is more than 2000-800 BC as the first and longer of the Metal Ages in Europe. During this time, tools, weapons and ornaments made of bronze were made. In some areas of the Bronze Age had a different time period. So they began in southern Germany before about 2300 BC and ended around 800 BC In northern Germany, however, it lasted from about 1600 to 500 BC The spread in Germany Cultures of the Bronze Age culture Unetice heard before about 2300 to 1600/1500 BC, which is named after the cemetery of Unetice (Aunjetitz) in Bohemia (Czech Republic). She was in the early stage of Bohemia, Moravia, the south-western Slovakia, spread Silesia, Lower Austria, Thuringia, Saxony-Anhalt and in the late stage in the eastern Lower Saxony and Brandenburg and in the South West of Poland. The text on the Unetice culture comes from the print book "Germany in the Bronze Age" (1996) Science of the Wiesbaden author Ernst Probst old German spelling and corresponds to the standard of knowledge. Other cultures of the Bronze Age from Germany will also be presented in separate publications.
orders: http://www.grin.com/e-book/93103/die-aunjetitzer-kultur-eine-kultur-der-bronzezeit-vor-etwa-2300-bis-1600-1500
The
Bronze Age The Bronze Age more than 2000 to 800 BC is considered the first and longer of the Metal Ages in Europe. During this time, tools, weapons and ornaments made of bronze were made. In some areas of the Bronze Age had a different time period. So they began in southern Germany before about 2300 BC and ended around 800 BC In northern Germany, however, it lasted from about 1600 to 500 BC The term "Bronze Age" in 1836 in a museum catalog by the Danish archaeologist Christian Jürgensen Thomsen (1788-l865) from Copenhagen introduced. The text of the book on the Bronze Age comes from the print works "Germany in the Bronze Age" (1996) Science of the Wiesbaden author Ernst Probst old German Spelling and corresponds to the standard of knowledge. Ernst Probst published the books "Germany in prehistoric times" (1986) and "Germany in the Stone Age" (1991).
orders: http://www.grin.com/e-book/93300/die-bronzezeit
The Barrow-culture
The Bronze Age more than 2000-800 BC is longer than the first and The Metal Ages in Europe. During this time, tools, weapons and ornaments made of bronze were made. In some areas of the Bronze Age had a different time period. So they began in southern Germany before about 2300 BC and ended around 800 BC In northern Germany, however, it lasted from about 1600 to 500 BC The spread of the Bronze Age cultures in Germany, the Barrow-cultural ago as 1600 to 1300/1200 BC According to current knowledge, the Barrow-culture of eastern France (Alsace) and was spread to Hungary (Carpathian Basin). It is identical in this area with the Middle Bronze Age and can be divided into numerous local groups. The concept of Barrow-culture based on the fact that about 1600 BC across much of Europe, the burial customs radically changed: instead of the dead in the Early Bronze Age in shallow graves to bury, poured it now often over the graves of one to two meters high grave mound and then placed on often other deceased is at. The text on the Barrow-culture comes from the print book "Germany in the Bronze Age" (1996) Science of the Wiesbaden author Ernst Probst old German spelling and corresponds to the standard of knowledge. Other cultures of the Bronze Age from Germany will also be presented in separate publications.
orders: http://www.grin.com/e-book/93208/die-huegelgraeber-kultur
The Lusatian culture
The Bronze Age is more than 2000-800 BC as the first and longer of the Metal Ages in Europe. During this time, tools, weapons and ornaments made of bronze were made. In some areas had the Bronze Age a different time period. So they began in southern Germany before about 2300 BC and ended around 800 BC In northern Germany, however, it lasted from about 1600 to 500 BC One of the most important Bronze Age cultures of Central Europe was v. by about 1300 to 500 BC . Lusatian culture. Its distribution area extended in the west to the Saale in central Germany, while in the southern North Bohemia, North Moravia, and the north-western Slovakia included. In the north-west was the southern Brandenburg to the east and formed the present-day Polish province of Posen (Poznan) the border. The prehistory distinguish between an eastern, western, Moravian-Silesian, Upper Silesian-Polish, Silesian and a medium-Lausitz-Saxon Group. For the western group reckoned that once, especially in the Lausitz, Brandenburg and Saxony in the southern resident Lausitz-Saxon group. The term "Lusatian culture" in 1880 marked the then acting in Berlin pathologist Rudolf Virchow (1821-1902). The text of the Lusatian culture comes from the print book "Germany in the Bronze Age" (1996) Science of the Wiesbaden author Ernst Probst old German spelling and corresponds to the standard of knowledge. Other cultures of the Bronze Age from Germany will also be presented in separate publications.
orders: http://www.grin.com/e-book/93341/die-lausitzer-kultur
The Lüneburg group in the Bronze Age, the Bronze Age
more than 2000-800 BC is longer than the first and the Metal Ages in Europe. During this time, tools, weapons and ornaments made of bronze were made. In some areas of the Bronze Age had a different time period. So they began in southern Germany before about 2300 BC and ended around 800 BC In northern Germany, however, it lasted from about 1600 to 500 BC The spread of the Bronze Age cultures in Germany, the Lüneburg group includes the older Bronze Age (about 1500 to 1200 BC), the Lüneburg group in the Middle Bronze Age (about 1200 to 1100. BC) and the Lüneburg group in the early Bronze Age (about 1100 to 800 BC). From the "Lüneburg Bronze Age," said the first time in 1939 in Munich working archaeologist Friedrich Holste (1908-1942). The now common term "Lüneburg group coined 1971, at the time at the museum Lüneburg working archaeologist Frederick Laux, which is dedicated to this publication, in gratitude for his valuable support. The texts of the Lüneburg group are from the print book "Germany in the Bronze Age" (1996) Science of the Wiesbaden author Ernst Probst old German spelling and comply with the standard of knowledge. Other cultures of the Bronze Age from Germany are also presented in separate publications.
orders: http://www.grin.com/e-book/93504/die-lueneburger-gruppe-in-der-bronzezeit
The Nordic Bronze Age The Bronze Age
more than 2000-800 BC . is considered the first and longer of the Metal Ages in Europe. During this time, tools, weapons and ornaments made of bronze were made. In some areas of the Bronze Age had a different time period. So they began in southern Germany before about 2300 BC and ended around 800 BC In northern Germany, however, it lasted from about 1600 to 500 BC The spread of the Bronze Age cultures in Germany include the Nordic Bronze Age and Early Bronze Age of the Nordic group (such as 1800-1500 BC), the Northern Early Bronze Age (about 1500 to 1200 BC), the Nordic Middle Bronze Age (about 1200 to 1100. BC) and the Nordic Late Bronze Age (about 1100 to 800 BC .). The Swedish archaeologist Oscar Montelius of the (1843-1921) derived term "Nordic group" based on the intrinsically-sized development of northern regions of Europe. The texts of the Nordic Bronze Age date from the print book "Germany in the Bronze Age" (1996) Science of the Wiesbaden author Ernst Probst old German spelling and comply with the standard of knowledge. Other cultures of the Bronze Age from Germany are also in individual publications presented.
orders: http://www.grin.com/e-book/93450/die-nordische-bronzezeit
The Stade group in the Bronze Age, the Bronze Age
more than 2000-800 BC, as is The first and longer of the Metal Ages in Europe. During this time, tools, weapons and ornaments made of bronze were made. In some areas of the Bronze Age had a different time period. So they began in southern Germany before about 2300 BC and ended around 800 BC In northern Germany, however, it lasted from about 1600 to 500 BC The spread of the Bronze Age cultures in Germany, the Stade group are in the older Bronze Age (about 1500 to 1200 BC), the Stade group in the middle Bronze Age (about 1200 to 1100. BC) and the Stade group in the early Bronze Age (about 1100 to 800 BC). The term "Stader group has used 1981, the archaeologist Arne Lucke in his Hamburg dissertation for the first time for a local group of the early Bronze Age. In contrast, use of the Hamburg archaeologist Friedrich Laux called "Stader group," he mentioned in 1987 at a lecture in Bad Stuer and which he in 1991 in an essay back, reached for a group that in the older, middle and late Bronze Age claimed. The texts of the Stade group are from the print book "Germany in the Bronze Age" (1996) the Wiesbaden science author Ernst Probst old German spelling and comply with the standard of knowledge. Other cultures of the Bronze Age from Germany will also be presented in separate publications.
orders: http://www.grin.com/e-book/93578/die-stader-gruppe-in-der-bronzezeit
The Straubinger culture
The Bronze Age more than 2000-800 BC . is considered the first and longer of the Metal Ages in Europe. During this time, tools, weapons and ornaments made of bronze were made. In some areas of the Bronze Age had a different time period. So they began in southern Germany before about 2300 BC and ended around 800 BC In northern Germany, however, it lasted from about 1600-500 BC The spread in Germany, the cultures of the Bronze Age culture Straubinger ago about 2300-1600 BC, was in southern Bavaria (Lower Bavaria, Upper Bavaria, and partly in the Upper Palatinate and Swabia) disseminated. Runners held their own in Upper Austria, in Salzburg and Kufstein in space in Northern Tyrol. The Straubinger culture is the oldest culture of the Early Bronze Age in the eastern southern Germany. Their metal craftsmen have produced in the early stage, also products of unalloyed copper and only in the late stage of bronze. The text on the Straubinger culture comes from the print book "Germany in the Bronze Age" (1996) of the Wiesbaden science writer Ernst Probst old German spelling and corresponds to the standard of knowledge. Other cultures of the Bronze Age from Germany will also be presented in separate publications.
orders: http://www.grin.com/e-book/113962/die-straubinger-kultur
the urnfield culture
The Bronze Age is more than 2000-800 BC as the first and longer of the Metal Ages in Europe. During this time, tools, weapons and ornaments made of bronze were made. In some areas of the Bronze Age had a different time period. So they began in southern Germany before about 2300 BC and ended around 800 BC In northern Germany, however, it lasted from about 1600 to 500 BC The spread in Germany Cultures of the Bronze Age is the urnfield culture from about 1300/1200 to 800 BC It is valid in Europe as one of the major cultures of the Late Bronze Age and could be from the northern Balkan countries on the Danube to the Upper Rhine region spread. In Germany it was in Baden-Wuerttemberg, Bavaria, Saarland, Rhineland-Palatinate, Hesse, North Rhine-Westphalia parts (Lower Rhine Basin) and south home of the Thuringian Forest. The term urnfield culture based upon the time that the dead burned at the stake and then often dumped their ashes or bones in clay urns and buried in graves were fire. Occasionally formed the cremations extensive urnfield with dozens or hundreds of funerals. The text on the urnfield culture comes from the print book "Germany in the Bronze Age" (1996) Science of the Wiesbaden author Ernst Probst old German spelling and corresponds to the standard of knowledge. Other cultures of the Bronze Age from Germany will also be presented in separate publications.
orders: http://www.grin.com/e-book/93166/die-urnenfelder-kultur 
Munich / Wiesbaden (world-of-Bronze Age) - On "GRIN for academic texts" are numerous printed brochures and e-books in PDF format available from cultures from the Bronze Age. These are chapters from the book "Germany in the Bronze Age" in old German spelling. These titles can be purchased at "GRIN" at the address http://www.grin.com the web. They are also available at more than 1,000 online bookstores as well as in any good bookstore. Below Summaries of these books and e-books: The Eagle Mountain
culture
The Bronze Age is more than 2000-800 BC as the first and longer of the Metal Ages in Europe. During this time, tools, weapons and ornaments made of bronze were made. In some areas of the Bronze Age had a different time period. So they began in southern Germany before about 2300 BC and ended around 800 BC In northern Germany, however, it lasted from about 1600 to 500 BC The spread of the Bronze Age cultures in Germany is the eagle mountain culture. She was from about 2100 1800 BC, the Upper Rhine Valley in Rhineland-Palatinate (Rheinland, Pfalz), Hesse and parts of Baden-Wuerttemberg (North York) disseminated. It is certainly emerged from the Neolithic Beaker culture. put it bluntly, it is "is a" Beaker-Beaker culture without. For these two cultural phenomena were in regards to the burial customs, bow and arrow and her identical settlement very close. The text on the eagle mountain culture comes from the print book "Germany in the Bronze Age" (1996) Science of the Wiesbaden author Ernst Probst old German spelling and corresponds to the standard of knowledge. Other cultures of the Bronze Age from Germany will also be presented in separate publications.
orders: http://www.grin.com/e-book/114062/die-adlerberg-kultur
The Unetice culture
The Bronze Age is more than 2000-800 BC as the first and longer of the Metal Ages in Europe. During this time, tools, weapons and ornaments made of bronze were made. In some areas of the Bronze Age had a different time period. So they began in southern Germany before about 2300 BC and ended around 800 BC In northern Germany, however, it lasted from about 1600 to 500 BC The spread in Germany Cultures of the Bronze Age culture Unetice heard before about 2300 to 1600/1500 BC, which is named after the cemetery of Unetice (Aunjetitz) in Bohemia (Czech Republic). She was in the early stage of Bohemia, Moravia, the south-western Slovakia, spread Silesia, Lower Austria, Thuringia, Saxony-Anhalt and in the late stage in the eastern Lower Saxony and Brandenburg and in the South West of Poland. The text on the Unetice culture comes from the print book "Germany in the Bronze Age" (1996) Science of the Wiesbaden author Ernst Probst old German spelling and corresponds to the standard of knowledge. Other cultures of the Bronze Age from Germany will also be presented in separate publications.
orders: http://www.grin.com/e-book/93103/die-aunjetitzer-kultur-eine-kultur-der-bronzezeit-vor-etwa-2300-bis-1600-1500
The
Bronze Age The Bronze Age more than 2000 to 800 BC is considered the first and longer of the Metal Ages in Europe. During this time, tools, weapons and ornaments made of bronze were made. In some areas of the Bronze Age had a different time period. So they began in southern Germany before about 2300 BC and ended around 800 BC In northern Germany, however, it lasted from about 1600 to 500 BC The term "Bronze Age" in 1836 in a museum catalog by the Danish archaeologist Christian Jürgensen Thomsen (1788-l865) from Copenhagen introduced. The text of the book on the Bronze Age comes from the print works "Germany in the Bronze Age" (1996) Science of the Wiesbaden author Ernst Probst old German Spelling and corresponds to the standard of knowledge. Ernst Probst published the books "Germany in prehistoric times" (1986) and "Germany in the Stone Age" (1991).
orders: http://www.grin.com/e-book/93300/die-bronzezeit
The Barrow-culture
The Bronze Age more than 2000-800 BC is longer than the first and The Metal Ages in Europe. During this time, tools, weapons and ornaments made of bronze were made. In some areas of the Bronze Age had a different time period. So they began in southern Germany before about 2300 BC and ended around 800 BC In northern Germany, however, it lasted from about 1600 to 500 BC The spread of the Bronze Age cultures in Germany, the Barrow-cultural ago as 1600 to 1300/1200 BC According to current knowledge, the Barrow-culture of eastern France (Alsace) and was spread to Hungary (Carpathian Basin). It is identical in this area with the Middle Bronze Age and can be divided into numerous local groups. The concept of Barrow-culture based on the fact that about 1600 BC across much of Europe, the burial customs radically changed: instead of the dead in the Early Bronze Age in shallow graves to bury, poured it now often over the graves of one to two meters high grave mound and then placed on often other deceased is at. The text on the Barrow-culture comes from the print book "Germany in the Bronze Age" (1996) Science of the Wiesbaden author Ernst Probst old German spelling and corresponds to the standard of knowledge. Other cultures of the Bronze Age from Germany will also be presented in separate publications.
orders: http://www.grin.com/e-book/93208/die-huegelgraeber-kultur
The Lusatian culture
The Bronze Age is more than 2000-800 BC as the first and longer of the Metal Ages in Europe. During this time, tools, weapons and ornaments made of bronze were made. In some areas had the Bronze Age a different time period. So they began in southern Germany before about 2300 BC and ended around 800 BC In northern Germany, however, it lasted from about 1600 to 500 BC One of the most important Bronze Age cultures of Central Europe was v. by about 1300 to 500 BC . Lusatian culture. Its distribution area extended in the west to the Saale in central Germany, while in the southern North Bohemia, North Moravia, and the north-western Slovakia included. In the north-west was the southern Brandenburg to the east and formed the present-day Polish province of Posen (Poznan) the border. The prehistory distinguish between an eastern, western, Moravian-Silesian, Upper Silesian-Polish, Silesian and a medium-Lausitz-Saxon Group. For the western group reckoned that once, especially in the Lausitz, Brandenburg and Saxony in the southern resident Lausitz-Saxon group. The term "Lusatian culture" in 1880 marked the then acting in Berlin pathologist Rudolf Virchow (1821-1902). The text of the Lusatian culture comes from the print book "Germany in the Bronze Age" (1996) Science of the Wiesbaden author Ernst Probst old German spelling and corresponds to the standard of knowledge. Other cultures of the Bronze Age from Germany will also be presented in separate publications.
orders: http://www.grin.com/e-book/93341/die-lausitzer-kultur
The Lüneburg group in the Bronze Age, the Bronze Age
more than 2000-800 BC is longer than the first and the Metal Ages in Europe. During this time, tools, weapons and ornaments made of bronze were made. In some areas of the Bronze Age had a different time period. So they began in southern Germany before about 2300 BC and ended around 800 BC In northern Germany, however, it lasted from about 1600 to 500 BC The spread of the Bronze Age cultures in Germany, the Lüneburg group includes the older Bronze Age (about 1500 to 1200 BC), the Lüneburg group in the Middle Bronze Age (about 1200 to 1100. BC) and the Lüneburg group in the early Bronze Age (about 1100 to 800 BC). From the "Lüneburg Bronze Age," said the first time in 1939 in Munich working archaeologist Friedrich Holste (1908-1942). The now common term "Lüneburg group coined 1971, at the time at the museum Lüneburg working archaeologist Frederick Laux, which is dedicated to this publication, in gratitude for his valuable support. The texts of the Lüneburg group are from the print book "Germany in the Bronze Age" (1996) Science of the Wiesbaden author Ernst Probst old German spelling and comply with the standard of knowledge. Other cultures of the Bronze Age from Germany are also presented in separate publications.
orders: http://www.grin.com/e-book/93504/die-lueneburger-gruppe-in-der-bronzezeit
The Nordic Bronze Age The Bronze Age
more than 2000-800 BC . is considered the first and longer of the Metal Ages in Europe. During this time, tools, weapons and ornaments made of bronze were made. In some areas of the Bronze Age had a different time period. So they began in southern Germany before about 2300 BC and ended around 800 BC In northern Germany, however, it lasted from about 1600 to 500 BC The spread of the Bronze Age cultures in Germany include the Nordic Bronze Age and Early Bronze Age of the Nordic group (such as 1800-1500 BC), the Northern Early Bronze Age (about 1500 to 1200 BC), the Nordic Middle Bronze Age (about 1200 to 1100. BC) and the Nordic Late Bronze Age (about 1100 to 800 BC .). The Swedish archaeologist Oscar Montelius of the (1843-1921) derived term "Nordic group" based on the intrinsically-sized development of northern regions of Europe. The texts of the Nordic Bronze Age date from the print book "Germany in the Bronze Age" (1996) Science of the Wiesbaden author Ernst Probst old German spelling and comply with the standard of knowledge. Other cultures of the Bronze Age from Germany are also in individual publications presented.
orders: http://www.grin.com/e-book/93450/die-nordische-bronzezeit
The Stade group in the Bronze Age, the Bronze Age
more than 2000-800 BC, as is The first and longer of the Metal Ages in Europe. During this time, tools, weapons and ornaments made of bronze were made. In some areas of the Bronze Age had a different time period. So they began in southern Germany before about 2300 BC and ended around 800 BC In northern Germany, however, it lasted from about 1600 to 500 BC The spread of the Bronze Age cultures in Germany, the Stade group are in the older Bronze Age (about 1500 to 1200 BC), the Stade group in the middle Bronze Age (about 1200 to 1100. BC) and the Stade group in the early Bronze Age (about 1100 to 800 BC). The term "Stader group has used 1981, the archaeologist Arne Lucke in his Hamburg dissertation for the first time for a local group of the early Bronze Age. In contrast, use of the Hamburg archaeologist Friedrich Laux called "Stader group," he mentioned in 1987 at a lecture in Bad Stuer and which he in 1991 in an essay back, reached for a group that in the older, middle and late Bronze Age claimed. The texts of the Stade group are from the print book "Germany in the Bronze Age" (1996) the Wiesbaden science author Ernst Probst old German spelling and comply with the standard of knowledge. Other cultures of the Bronze Age from Germany will also be presented in separate publications.
orders: http://www.grin.com/e-book/93578/die-stader-gruppe-in-der-bronzezeit
The Straubinger culture
The Bronze Age more than 2000-800 BC . is considered the first and longer of the Metal Ages in Europe. During this time, tools, weapons and ornaments made of bronze were made. In some areas of the Bronze Age had a different time period. So they began in southern Germany before about 2300 BC and ended around 800 BC In northern Germany, however, it lasted from about 1600-500 BC The spread in Germany, the cultures of the Bronze Age culture Straubinger ago about 2300-1600 BC, was in southern Bavaria (Lower Bavaria, Upper Bavaria, and partly in the Upper Palatinate and Swabia) disseminated. Runners held their own in Upper Austria, in Salzburg and Kufstein in space in Northern Tyrol. The Straubinger culture is the oldest culture of the Early Bronze Age in the eastern southern Germany. Their metal craftsmen have produced in the early stage, also products of unalloyed copper and only in the late stage of bronze. The text on the Straubinger culture comes from the print book "Germany in the Bronze Age" (1996) of the Wiesbaden science writer Ernst Probst old German spelling and corresponds to the standard of knowledge. Other cultures of the Bronze Age from Germany will also be presented in separate publications.
orders: http://www.grin.com/e-book/113962/die-straubinger-kultur
the urnfield culture
The Bronze Age is more than 2000-800 BC as the first and longer of the Metal Ages in Europe. During this time, tools, weapons and ornaments made of bronze were made. In some areas of the Bronze Age had a different time period. So they began in southern Germany before about 2300 BC and ended around 800 BC In northern Germany, however, it lasted from about 1600 to 500 BC The spread in Germany Cultures of the Bronze Age is the urnfield culture from about 1300/1200 to 800 BC It is valid in Europe as one of the major cultures of the Late Bronze Age and could be from the northern Balkan countries on the Danube to the Upper Rhine region spread. In Germany it was in Baden-Wuerttemberg, Bavaria, Saarland, Rhineland-Palatinate, Hesse, North Rhine-Westphalia parts (Lower Rhine Basin) and south home of the Thuringian Forest. The term urnfield culture based upon the time that the dead burned at the stake and then often dumped their ashes or bones in clay urns and buried in graves were fire. Occasionally formed the cremations extensive urnfield with dozens or hundreds of funerals. The text on the urnfield culture comes from the print book "Germany in the Bronze Age" (1996) Science of the Wiesbaden author Ernst Probst old German spelling and corresponds to the standard of knowledge. Other cultures of the Bronze Age from Germany will also be presented in separate publications.
orders: http://www.grin.com/e-book/93166/die-urnenfelder-kultur
Thursday, September 23, 2010
Women Girdle And Stocking
Virtual?
A small addition to the dubious to recall decision in Munich with a virtual monument to the victims of National Socialism. It is a contribution from the below-mentioned Jewish Allmanach about places and spaces and quotes an e-mail joke that many received during the al-Aqsa Intifada. Just to reiterate here to clear the message was wrong (but not the oppressive subtext of the joke):
" Washington, D C., December 28 (Intelligence) As a sign of the end of terretorialen` phase '.. Zionism was the Barak government today announced the launch of a virtual Israel, which was to take the place of the real Israel. On the occasion of a gala at the White House to celebrate a renewed thrust on the Israeli-Palestinian peace, Prime Minister Barak, that all the expelled Jews living in Israel to a new Arab state of Palestine to make room. However, the displaced Jews in Israeli cyberspace with websites would be compensated. The new state of Israel is to see www.postzionism.com. 'This requires some sacrifice on the part of Israelis', Barak admitted, `but it's worth the peace'."
(Source:. Allmanach Jewish - places and spaces, Jewish publishing house, edited by Gisela Dachs, p. 14 )
A small addition to the dubious to recall decision in Munich with a virtual monument to the victims of National Socialism. It is a contribution from the below-mentioned Jewish Allmanach about places and spaces and quotes an e-mail joke that many received during the al-Aqsa Intifada. Just to reiterate here to clear the message was wrong (but not the oppressive subtext of the joke):
" Washington, D C., December 28 (Intelligence) As a sign of the end of terretorialen` phase '.. Zionism was the Barak government today announced the launch of a virtual Israel, which was to take the place of the real Israel. On the occasion of a gala at the White House to celebrate a renewed thrust on the Israeli-Palestinian peace, Prime Minister Barak, that all the expelled Jews living in Israel to a new Arab state of Palestine to make room. However, the displaced Jews in Israeli cyberspace with websites would be compensated. The new state of Israel is to see www.postzionism.com. 'This requires some sacrifice on the part of Israelis', Barak admitted, `but it's worth the peace'."
(Source:. Allmanach Jewish - places and spaces, Jewish publishing house, edited by Gisela Dachs, p. 14 )
Wednesday, September 22, 2010
Dental Exam Emirates Sample
affirmation of forgetting
the occasion of the presentation of the competition "victims of Nazism - New forms of remembrance" in Munich, here again, a reference to my open letter of December 2008.
(Note: click first link and then scroll right down)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
have already in my competition entry I noted critically that the refusal to define a place of memory, the basic problem of this contest was. This virtual memorial is an affirmation This immeasurable. Even then, I've
asked whether a virtual media project rather not be in the realm of oblivion as the moves of remembering. The city of Munich has now missed an opportunity: It was namely from the beginning of this competition is not a "formal" but a "physical" solution. It was whether the city of Munich the courage demonstrated a physical space for victims to make available - and not any, but with a weight! Since most of these places, such as the Royal Palace, created in the vicinity of the new Nazi documentation center, but not the city, but the Free State of Bavaria is one of the conflict once again a little more complex. It was therefore a bold decision with the political realities to deal! to "occupy" My decision to go with the king place one of the sore points in Munich had reason, it was expected, just as little chance of "success". It was important to me but because it would have been just the starting point of that discussion, which unfortunately failed to (and will probably never done). More seriously, therefore, that the hoped-for confrontation and then failed to public debate and everything was enveloped in a collective silence. This was not only Disrespectful to all participating artists over, there was a dramatic confirmation that Munich had failed on this issue.
So what can we expect from tomorrow's event at the Munich Town Hall Gallery? Besides the usual gestures of self-affirmation probably not much!
From the silence is hardly more than a more or less short-media noise.
Yet! Still less regard to the fundamental problem of this dubious Tender process and just such a jury decision that it would be worth discussing:
Some years ago have been conducted in Jerusalem at a similar theme, but with completely different circumstances, a fierce public debate. It was whether to install a webcam at the Wailing Wall or Zionist diasporic is ... You can guess which side of the coin in the KotelCAM lay there for many!
Who wants to read should the Jewish Almmanach - order places and spaces from the Jewish publisher (Suhrkamp), edited by Gisela Dachs and specifically Shaindy Rudoff review lead Holy cyber sites to heart. 
the occasion of the presentation of the competition "victims of Nazism - New forms of remembrance" in Munich, here again, a reference to my open letter of December 2008.
(Note: click first link and then scroll right down)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
have already in my competition entry I noted critically that the refusal to define a place of memory, the basic problem of this contest was. This virtual memorial is an affirmation This immeasurable. Even then, I've
asked whether a virtual media project rather not be in the realm of oblivion as the moves of remembering. The city of Munich has now missed an opportunity: It was namely from the beginning of this competition is not a "formal" but a "physical" solution. It was whether the city of Munich the courage demonstrated a physical space for victims to make available - and not any, but with a weight! Since most of these places, such as the Royal Palace, created in the vicinity of the new Nazi documentation center, but not the city, but the Free State of Bavaria is one of the conflict once again a little more complex. It was therefore a bold decision with the political realities to deal! to "occupy" My decision to go with the king place one of the sore points in Munich had reason, it was expected, just as little chance of "success". It was important to me but because it would have been just the starting point of that discussion, which unfortunately failed to (and will probably never done). More seriously, therefore, that the hoped-for confrontation and then failed to public debate and everything was enveloped in a collective silence. This was not only Disrespectful to all participating artists over, there was a dramatic confirmation that Munich had failed on this issue.
So what can we expect from tomorrow's event at the Munich Town Hall Gallery? Besides the usual gestures of self-affirmation probably not much!
From the silence is hardly more than a more or less short-media noise.
Yet! Still less regard to the fundamental problem of this dubious Tender process and just such a jury decision that it would be worth discussing:
Some years ago have been conducted in Jerusalem at a similar theme, but with completely different circumstances, a fierce public debate. It was whether to install a webcam at the Wailing Wall or Zionist diasporic is ... You can guess which side of the coin in the KotelCAM lay there for many!
Who wants to read should the Jewish Almmanach - order places and spaces from the Jewish publisher (Suhrkamp), edited by Gisela Dachs and specifically Shaindy Rudoff review lead Holy cyber sites to heart.
Tuesday, September 21, 2010
Computer Start Button For Pokemon
The virtual state / Notice to Federal Data Summit
Let us imagine that the media networked society to be regarded as virtual state. Of course this would be a virtual state with completely different rules and objectives as the state structure the physical world. The founding of this nation should not even be proclaimed in a solemn ceremony, even though its inhabitants, or number of users and its economic power would be greater than that of most nations on earth.
constitutional lawyer would certainly raise many legitimate objections to such an idea: Would such a state under international law even possible? Would other states to recognize such an individualistic Union? Who would be the president of this virtual state? In what location would be the seat of government? If this state ever established a written constitution? And if there is a constitutional would this be democratic? Would such a state of danger to go out?
It would also, we argue, there were already experimental (and failed) the creation of states, such as the Austrian artist Edwin Lipburger, who exclaimed in 1976 with a ball-shaped house, the "Republic Kugelmugel" in Wiener Neustadt. The project book launched from a violent dispute in Austria. Because of official arrogance Lipburger was finally convicted three years later to 10 months in prison. Today, the building as a carnival-oddity at the Vienna Prater. Other start-ups such as the environmental organization Greenpeace, a Political Namely the goal to block oil drilling in the North Sea. Greenpeace occupied a 25 meter wide and 20 meters high rock, 450 kilometers off the coast of Scotland, and called the state attributes "Wave Country". The self proclaimed "data haven" was indeed the surf of the sea but can not withstand the loss of data was carried out by the liquidation of its provider. Today this Waveland only of an "imaginary space".
quite different but it would behave with the new virtual state:
He decided not to declare themselves, because there is nobody who could call him. He dispenses with a central organizational structure, because its rhizomatic structure invisible makes it invulnerable. It offers maximum freedom, even if freedom threatened by Google's monopoly on power in the network. This State omitted even insisted to claim officially physical land, except for the cooled locations of the servers. Unfortunately, Germany
has produced not a single Internet start-up that could compete in the category of Google, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and similar Internet majors. Why you consider this country now, where is is exactly the "red line" that Google & Co can not be exceeded. It almost seems like a desperate attempt to cloud to miss a Din standard. So while the physical limits of the States, through rivers, Mountains, or were formed along the old battle lines knows, this virtual state limit.
Moreover, even if the user of the virtual state are at the same time a citizen of a physical nation-state would not necessarily mean that this is in the public interest such as Germany are committed.
Had this state, only a fiction? No, because this virtual state would not be in contrast to the real, but the physical, because without a doubt are the electronic systems are not fictitious or unreal world, but act directly in the physical world - with sometimes tragic consequences, such as was the financial crisis. Many people have lost their physical homes. Just Facebook and Twitter would retain them as a "virtual home" until the last credit card would be confiscated.
we are about so ago that this "virtual state" with all those who have the physical nation-states turned their backs, now it begins to colonize the physical world. New rules would establish its technical qua appearance. Obsolete national and regional laws of the old nation-states would be as ineffective as the dance of an Indian medicine man at the arrival of the first English galley.
has just found the Federal Data Summit in Berlin. This policy is in Germany on a national data protection regime and the self-regulation by the market. This must be seen as capitulation! Even if it will shed the virtual colonial masters a few crocodile tears, one can assume that it will leave them at the end of the day quite cold. 
Let us imagine that the media networked society to be regarded as virtual state. Of course this would be a virtual state with completely different rules and objectives as the state structure the physical world. The founding of this nation should not even be proclaimed in a solemn ceremony, even though its inhabitants, or number of users and its economic power would be greater than that of most nations on earth.
constitutional lawyer would certainly raise many legitimate objections to such an idea: Would such a state under international law even possible? Would other states to recognize such an individualistic Union? Who would be the president of this virtual state? In what location would be the seat of government? If this state ever established a written constitution? And if there is a constitutional would this be democratic? Would such a state of danger to go out?
It would also, we argue, there were already experimental (and failed) the creation of states, such as the Austrian artist Edwin Lipburger, who exclaimed in 1976 with a ball-shaped house, the "Republic Kugelmugel" in Wiener Neustadt. The project book launched from a violent dispute in Austria. Because of official arrogance Lipburger was finally convicted three years later to 10 months in prison. Today, the building as a carnival-oddity at the Vienna Prater. Other start-ups such as the environmental organization Greenpeace, a Political Namely the goal to block oil drilling in the North Sea. Greenpeace occupied a 25 meter wide and 20 meters high rock, 450 kilometers off the coast of Scotland, and called the state attributes "Wave Country". The self proclaimed "data haven" was indeed the surf of the sea but can not withstand the loss of data was carried out by the liquidation of its provider. Today this Waveland only of an "imaginary space".
quite different but it would behave with the new virtual state:
He decided not to declare themselves, because there is nobody who could call him. He dispenses with a central organizational structure, because its rhizomatic structure invisible makes it invulnerable. It offers maximum freedom, even if freedom threatened by Google's monopoly on power in the network. This State omitted even insisted to claim officially physical land, except for the cooled locations of the servers. Unfortunately, Germany
has produced not a single Internet start-up that could compete in the category of Google, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and similar Internet majors. Why you consider this country now, where is is exactly the "red line" that Google & Co can not be exceeded. It almost seems like a desperate attempt to cloud to miss a Din standard. So while the physical limits of the States, through rivers, Mountains, or were formed along the old battle lines knows, this virtual state limit.
Moreover, even if the user of the virtual state are at the same time a citizen of a physical nation-state would not necessarily mean that this is in the public interest such as Germany are committed.
Had this state, only a fiction? No, because this virtual state would not be in contrast to the real, but the physical, because without a doubt are the electronic systems are not fictitious or unreal world, but act directly in the physical world - with sometimes tragic consequences, such as was the financial crisis. Many people have lost their physical homes. Just Facebook and Twitter would retain them as a "virtual home" until the last credit card would be confiscated.
we are about so ago that this "virtual state" with all those who have the physical nation-states turned their backs, now it begins to colonize the physical world. New rules would establish its technical qua appearance. Obsolete national and regional laws of the old nation-states would be as ineffective as the dance of an Indian medicine man at the arrival of the first English galley.
has just found the Federal Data Summit in Berlin. This policy is in Germany on a national data protection regime and the self-regulation by the market. This must be seen as capitulation! Even if it will shed the virtual colonial masters a few crocodile tears, one can assume that it will leave them at the end of the day quite cold.
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
World Largest Indian Boobs
Virtual Air Rights
proposal on Web-based Location Based Services
PUBLISHED BY THE PUBLIC SPACE
(This article was posted on Wednesday the 22 . published Sept. 2010 in the Austrian daily Der Standard. More info here. )
How would react to Germany well, if not send the private company Google, but countries such as China or Pakistan special camera vehicles are to be filming every corner of our country, exactly? If we do not feel threatened in our state sovereignty?
The question is purely rhetorical, however, because Google gives figures for years and has filmed in every corner of our country. Google's approach reveals the helplessness of the policy on this issue and provides uncertainty among citizens.
Either one refers to the antiquated notion of freedom of panorama or one questions the utility of Street View for the citizens on the road. Even the data is in danger of running into the void, because he has to deal with border areas, such as whether a license plate or a face on Street View can be seen. As important as these subtleties in detail may be, so little help to get the virtual collection of the entire public space in the handle.
For years, is emerging in a dramatic way, how dull the weapons of copyright and data protection on the Internet. Too many and often conflicting regional and national laws pry often mutually exclusive. At the same time avoid Many companies in the rule of law, as the case law on the Internet is always related to the physical location of a server. This is then for example, on an island in the ocean, or somewhere in Russia. At the same time it seems the policy to not care that our physical surroundings, what we call the public space that is free from Google Street View regarded as a mere resource. Through its ongoing publication and our "self-publication", the public space is transformed to the published room. It is only natural that apply in this new space rules!
handled Why the policy with the concept of freedom of panorama, although it is clear Street View postcard that no photographer, but a data vacuum cleaners and recycling systems. The real price of all citizens for the free use of spatial data services is the permanent and unconditional release of all their available information and any personal data. Each verified record - including motion profile - a glass drinking citizen is worth real money.
but apart from the purely commercial aspects is emerging a new balance of power between the public space and the published room: In the public space you can move anonymously. In space no one learns to publish the data collected by Google, who they waived View from the CIA, nor can and what will be done exactly with the data. Google works as a digital diary that we write every day voluntarily or involuntarily, as we reveal to us permanently. At the end of the day we get it but never see.
Many citizens in Europe do not therefore understand why it is not possible Google halt. No one understands why Google can enforce the opt-out "principle and it pro-actively raise any objection must be a tight deadline to October 2010! At the same time it is hard to understand why our politicians give the spatial data and images of our cities for interactive media willingly. So how
can establish the modern rules for the published room? How could the policy to regain sovereignty over the physical location and benefit the other, the cities and municipalities of their virtualization? Maybe it's actually not a Lex Google, as it rejects Thomas de Maizière, but simply about the preservation of what we have previously taken for granted: the public space.
An idea could therefore be the virtual use rights of geospatial web services based on the ownership and use rights of specific physical locations to couple. This coupling would only be logical because the establishment and use of a virtual doppelganger of our city and all of its buildings has a fundamental effect on precisely this. One fact we must always keep in mind. The virtual is not the opposite of the real, but the physical. We should therefore extend the term freedom of panorama with the panoramic term protection and achieve a settlement that may better suit a model of "virtual air rights."
The idea of this - we call them - "Virtual Air Rights" would be comparable to the control of air rights in high-rise buildings in the U.S.. The shading that results from a building and the provision of public spaces at street level in New York for example, have direct influence on construction and use rights. This idea would be to answer the question: Do we continue to accept the virtualization of public space, live simply in order to finally give these defenseless in a digital shadow?
The idea of the Virtual Air Rights would be a powerful tool for digital self-determination and to sovereignty over the public space preserved: Each owner of a physical property or a physical home, every community, every city, it could sell rights to a collecting society, Rent or reserve. A city like Munich could refuse, for instance for reasons of preservation or City marketing that made the winning goal in Google Earth and Street View is a virtual McDonalds arches. Just as the city could share in the advertising revenue, so long as it does on billboards in public spaces - to protect individuals, and finally to the profit of the general public!
The forms and details for a reaction, such as creating a kind of Gema for the public space, at this point are still open. We should discuss the possibility of Virtual Air Rights, but as soon as possible!
Stephan Doesinger, 2010 
proposal on Web-based Location Based Services
PUBLISHED BY THE PUBLIC SPACE
(This article was posted on Wednesday the 22 . published Sept. 2010 in the Austrian daily Der Standard. More info here. )
How would react to Germany well, if not send the private company Google, but countries such as China or Pakistan special camera vehicles are to be filming every corner of our country, exactly? If we do not feel threatened in our state sovereignty?
The question is purely rhetorical, however, because Google gives figures for years and has filmed in every corner of our country. Google's approach reveals the helplessness of the policy on this issue and provides uncertainty among citizens.
Either one refers to the antiquated notion of freedom of panorama or one questions the utility of Street View for the citizens on the road. Even the data is in danger of running into the void, because he has to deal with border areas, such as whether a license plate or a face on Street View can be seen. As important as these subtleties in detail may be, so little help to get the virtual collection of the entire public space in the handle.
For years, is emerging in a dramatic way, how dull the weapons of copyright and data protection on the Internet. Too many and often conflicting regional and national laws pry often mutually exclusive. At the same time avoid Many companies in the rule of law, as the case law on the Internet is always related to the physical location of a server. This is then for example, on an island in the ocean, or somewhere in Russia. At the same time it seems the policy to not care that our physical surroundings, what we call the public space that is free from Google Street View regarded as a mere resource. Through its ongoing publication and our "self-publication", the public space is transformed to the published room. It is only natural that apply in this new space rules!
handled Why the policy with the concept of freedom of panorama, although it is clear Street View postcard that no photographer, but a data vacuum cleaners and recycling systems. The real price of all citizens for the free use of spatial data services is the permanent and unconditional release of all their available information and any personal data. Each verified record - including motion profile - a glass drinking citizen is worth real money.
but apart from the purely commercial aspects is emerging a new balance of power between the public space and the published room: In the public space you can move anonymously. In space no one learns to publish the data collected by Google, who they waived View from the CIA, nor can and what will be done exactly with the data. Google works as a digital diary that we write every day voluntarily or involuntarily, as we reveal to us permanently. At the end of the day we get it but never see.
Many citizens in Europe do not therefore understand why it is not possible Google halt. No one understands why Google can enforce the opt-out "principle and it pro-actively raise any objection must be a tight deadline to October 2010! At the same time it is hard to understand why our politicians give the spatial data and images of our cities for interactive media willingly. So how
can establish the modern rules for the published room? How could the policy to regain sovereignty over the physical location and benefit the other, the cities and municipalities of their virtualization? Maybe it's actually not a Lex Google, as it rejects Thomas de Maizière, but simply about the preservation of what we have previously taken for granted: the public space.
An idea could therefore be the virtual use rights of geospatial web services based on the ownership and use rights of specific physical locations to couple. This coupling would only be logical because the establishment and use of a virtual doppelganger of our city and all of its buildings has a fundamental effect on precisely this. One fact we must always keep in mind. The virtual is not the opposite of the real, but the physical. We should therefore extend the term freedom of panorama with the panoramic term protection and achieve a settlement that may better suit a model of "virtual air rights."
The idea of this - we call them - "Virtual Air Rights" would be comparable to the control of air rights in high-rise buildings in the U.S.. The shading that results from a building and the provision of public spaces at street level in New York for example, have direct influence on construction and use rights. This idea would be to answer the question: Do we continue to accept the virtualization of public space, live simply in order to finally give these defenseless in a digital shadow?
The idea of the Virtual Air Rights would be a powerful tool for digital self-determination and to sovereignty over the public space preserved: Each owner of a physical property or a physical home, every community, every city, it could sell rights to a collecting society, Rent or reserve. A city like Munich could refuse, for instance for reasons of preservation or City marketing that made the winning goal in Google Earth and Street View is a virtual McDonalds arches. Just as the city could share in the advertising revenue, so long as it does on billboards in public spaces - to protect individuals, and finally to the profit of the general public!
The forms and details for a reaction, such as creating a kind of Gema for the public space, at this point are still open. We should discuss the possibility of Virtual Air Rights, but as soon as possible!
Stephan Doesinger, 2010
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)